[Sls-rfm] Fw: SRRC filtering of OQPSK - proposed editorial changes to CCSDS 413.0-G-3 - correction

Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int
Mon Feb 11 08:26:55 UTC 2019


Dear Tom,

it seemed we made a mistake with a reference. The text below is correct 
(change in yellow highlight.) I also included a rev1 word document - now 
the reference is generated as an automatic cross reference.

Sorry for that,

Enrico








From:   Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA
To:     "Thomas Gannett" <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
Cc:     sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org, Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA at ESA
Date:   08/02/2019 14:56
Subject:        Fw: SRRC filtering of OQPSK - proposed editorial changes 
to CCSDS 413.0-G-3


Dear Tom,

I have not received any negative comments to my proposal. As such, I would 
like to ask you via the AD to find the easiest and quickest way to publish 
such small editorial improvement (in red below for convenience).

Best Regards, Enrico




----- Forwarded by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA on 08/02/2019 14:51 -----

From:   Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA
To:     sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org
Cc:     Thomas Gannett <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
Date:   31/01/2019 09:51
Subject:        SRRC filtering of OQPSK - proposed editorial changes to 
CCSDS 413.0-G-3


Dear All,

I was recently approached by European industry on the correctness of 
figures 3-25 and 3-26 in the green book on bandwidth efficient modulation. 
The industry was confused about the use of symbol rate and suggested it 
should be the channel symbol rate instead. After an exchange with the NASA 
authors of the relevant section 3.2.2.3.2.1 "Baseband Filtered OQPSK with 
a Square Root Raised Cosine Filter", it was determined that there was 
nothing wrong with the two figures. Simulations were done again and 
returned the same plots.
However, we agreed that some additional explanations would help readers in 
understanding this section better and avoiding confusion in future.

The proposed revision marks in the attachment are the agreed ESA/NASA 
additions. Note that we consider them just editorial improvements.

If I do not receive any negative comments from you by February 7, I will 
assume RFM WG concurrence and submit the attachment to the CCSDS Editor 
via the SLS Area Director.

Best Regards, Enrico


P.S. Please note that since I just pasted the whole section (and the 
previous one) of the green book into a blank document, you will get a 
number of missing references when printing the two pages. Just look at 
them on the screen or disable the reference updating function when 
printing.


[attachment "Proposed edtorials to BW-efficient Mod GB (413x0g3).docx" 
deleted by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA] 



This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20190211/477635ed/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 46526 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20190211/477635ed/attachment-0002.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 46444 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20190211/477635ed/attachment-0003.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Proposed edtorials to BW-efficient Mod GB (413x0g3)rev1.docx
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 136409 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20190211/477635ed/attachment-0001.obj>


More information about the SLS-RFM mailing list