<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Dear Tom,</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">it seemed we made
a mistake with a reference. The text below is correct (change in yellow
highlight.) I also included a rev1 word document - now the reference is
generated as an automatic cross reference.</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Sorry for that,</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Enrico</span>
<br>
<br>
<br><img src=cid:_1_0FD367380FD36380002E6888C125839E style="border:0px solid;">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">From:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">Enrico
Vassallo/esoc/ESA</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">To:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"Thomas
Gannett" <thomas.gannett@tgannett.net></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Cc:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">sls-rfm@mailman.ccsds.org,
Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA@ESA</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Date:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">08/02/2019
14:56</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Subject:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">Fw:
SRRC filtering of OQPSK - proposed editorial changes to CCSDS 413.0-G-3</span>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Dear Tom,</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">I have not received
any negative comments to my proposal. As such, I would like to ask you
via the AD to find the easiest and quickest way to publish such small editorial
improvement (in red below for convenience).</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Best Regards,
Enrico</span>
<br>
<br>
<br><img src=cid:_1_0FD439180FD43508002E6888C125839E style="border:0px solid;">
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#800080;font-family:sans-serif">-----
Forwarded by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA on 08/02/2019 14:51 -----</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">From:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">Enrico
Vassallo/esoc/ESA</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">To:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">sls-rfm@mailman.ccsds.org</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Cc:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">Thomas
Gannett <thomas.gannett@tgannett.net></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Date:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">31/01/2019
09:51</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Subject:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">SRRC
filtering of OQPSK - proposed editorial changes to CCSDS 413.0-G-3</span>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Dear All,</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">I was recently
approached by European industry on the correctness of figures 3-25 and
3-26 in the green book on bandwidth efficient modulation. The industry
was confused about the use of symbol rate and suggested it should be the
channel symbol rate instead. After an exchange with the NASA authors of
the relevant section 3.2.2.3.2.1 "Baseband Filtered OQPSK with a Square
Root Raised Cosine Filter", it was determined that there was nothing
wrong with the two figures. Simulations were done again and returned the
same plots.</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">However, we agreed
that some additional explanations would help readers in understanding this
section better and avoiding confusion in future.</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">The proposed revision
marks in the attachment are the agreed ESA/NASA additions. Note that we
consider them just editorial improvements.</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">If I do not receive
any negative comments from you by February 7, I will assume RFM WG concurrence
and submit the attachment to the CCSDS Editor via the SLS Area Director.</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Best Regards,
Enrico</span>
<br>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">P.S. Please note
that since I just pasted the whole section (and the previous one) of the
green book into a blank document, you will get a number of missing references
when printing the two pages. Just look at them on the screen or disable
the reference updating function when printing.</span>
<br>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">[attachment "Proposed
edtorials to BW-efficient Mod GB (413x0g3).docx" deleted by Enrico
Vassallo/esoc/ESA] </span>
<br>
<br>
<br><PRE>This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo@esa.int).
</PRE>