[Css-csts] updated Errata sheets and posting them on the CWE 2 more!

[John Pietras]

CSTSWG colleagues ---
There are two more errata sheets that I forgot to post in my message below - TmAosMcDemuxRcpt-1901024-JP (formerly RtnMcDemuxRcpt) and TmAosVcDemuxRcpt-1901024-JP (formerly RtnVcDemuxRcpt). The name changes reflect the decisions that we made to (a) combine TM and AOS space data link protocol reception functionality intoa single FR set and (b) drop the "return" prefix to allow theses FRs to be used in nodes other than an ESLT.

Best regards,
John

From: John Pietras
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2019 11:31 AM
To: CCSDS_CSTSWG (css-csts at mailman.ccsds.org) <css-csts at mailman.ccsds.org>; Wolfgang Hell <wo_._he at t-online.de>
Subject: updated Errata sheets and posting them on the CWE

CSTSWG colleagues ---
At the Fall 2019 Workshop, we resolved a number of questions/issues regarding various FRs, and Wolfgang and I agreed to update their respective errata sheets. For my part, I initially had 3 errata sheets to update - TCMcMux, TcVcMux, and FCltuTsProvider. There was one issue common to all transfer service provider FRs (related to network and ISP-1 parameter settings), so I updated the errata sheets for those FRs also. Al errata sheets that contain updates that are solely the result of decisions made at the fall meeting carry the date stamp "191024". However, in updating the errata sheets, I came across a few new issues. Errata sheets that contain these new issues have date stamps of today - 191104. The updated errata sheets are attached.

I think that we briefly discussed putting the errata sheets on the CWE, but I don't think that we made any specific plans. I propose that they should be uploaded to a new FR Errata Sheets folder in the CWE > Functional Resources Definition folder.  Beyond that, I think that we have 2 decisions to make.

The first decision is whether to just put all of the FR errata sheets directly into the FR Errata Sheets folder, or to introduce in intermediate set of folders. Personally I would like to see an intermediate set of folders, because otherwise we will have a long (and over time, increasingly long) list of documents that will be organized by FR name (classifier). A relatively simple set of intermediate folders could be named for the FR strata: Aperture, Physical Channel, etc. If we choose to go this way (or to use a different set of intermediate folders) I will put those folders into the CWE.

The second decision is on the naming of the errata sheets. So far Wolfgang and I have been including a data stamp and our initials in the names of the files to keep them sorted out. However, by using the SharePoint-based CWE, we have the opportunity to keep just the one copy of the file and perform our updates to the online copy. Wolfgang and I have already established a pattern for labeling our updates with our initial and a data stamp, so traceability of changes shouldn't be an issue.

I am interested in hearing your comments.

Best regards,
John
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/css-csts/attachments/20191104/fa2ec4a5/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: TmAosVcDemuxRcpt-1901024-JP.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 18831 bytes
Desc: TmAosVcDemuxRcpt-1901024-JP.docx
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/css-csts/attachments/20191104/fa2ec4a5/attachment-0002.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: TmAosMcDemuxRcpt-191024-JP.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 21154 bytes
Desc: TmAosMcDemuxRcpt-191024-JP.docx
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/css-csts/attachments/20191104/fa2ec4a5/attachment-0003.docx>