[Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 15 July 2016
Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
Mon Jul 18 07:54:21 UTC 2016
Dear all
Results of Poll CESG-P-2016-06-001 Release USLP for Agency Review was wrongly interpreted by the Secretariat
The poll has failed due to lack of quorum
See Proc & Org YB
I suggest to extend the poll according to section 5.3.5.4.4.3
Ciao
Nestor
Sent from my iPhone using IBM Verse
On 17 Jul 2016, 23:32:06, thomas.gannett at tgannett.net wrote:
From: thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
To: cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org
Cc:
Date: 17 Jul 2016 23:32:06
Subject: [Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 15 July 2016
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-06-001 Approval to release CCSDS
732.1-R-1, Unified Space Link Protocol (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS
Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 30 June 2016 and ending 15 July 2016:
Abstain: 0 (0%)
Approve Unconditionally: 2 (66.67%) (Merri, Barton)
Approve with Conditions: 1 (33.33%) (Shames)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions): In reading thru this document
I have found a number of editorial issues, but for the most part the
document is in pretty good shape. Most of the identified issues are
about clarity and presentation, but there are a few editorial issues as well.
Much of the complexity is due to covering both fixed and variable
length frames and both TC & TM coding and synch approaches. Likewise
the inclusion of both COP-1 and COP-P adds complexity that could be
further worked. I am assuming that a book of this complexity and
impact may well go through more than one Red Book review, so the WG
may wish to send it out in its current form to gather a broader set
of inputs before tackling these issues.
This is a revised submission following a review of the complete document.
Total Respondents: 3
No response was received from the following Area(s):
CSS
SLS
SIS
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate CMC poll after
conditions have been addressed
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-06-002 Approval to release CCSDS
766.2-R-1, Voice and Audio Communications (Red Book, Issue 1) for
CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 30 June 2016 and ending 15 July 2016:
Abstain: 0 (0%)
Approve Unconditionally: 3 (60%) (Merri, Cola, Barton)
Approve with Conditions: 2 (40%) (Shames, Calzolari)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions): This is intended to be an
CCSDS Blue Book, but it reads more like a cookbook for a small subset
of agencies. As such it is somewhat off-base in terms of what is
usually published as a Blue Book, but it likely still serves a useful
purpose for those who require it.
However, there are a number of issues with style and accuracy.
Incorrect references, acronyms used without definitions, lots of
products identified without references to standards, etc. I marked a
bunch of them, but not all by any means. I recommend that they be
fixed before this is sent out to agency review.
Gian Paolo Calzolari (Approve with Conditions): See attached file.
NOTE: There can be a general issue of alignment of this book with
respect to CFDP Blue Book in the sense that this books looks for an
alignment with CFDP Issue 5 while the CFDP version in force is 4 and
e.g. it ignores DTN. This may an issue for CESG.
Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):
CSS
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate CMC poll after
conditions have been addressed
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-06-003 Approval to publish CCSDS
766.1-B-2, Digital Motion Imagery (Blue Book, Issue 2)
Results of CESG poll beginning 30 June 2016 and ending 15 July 2016:
Abstain: 0 (0%)
Approve Unconditionally: 6 (100%) (Merri, Shames, Scott, Cola,
Calzolari, Barton)
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
Total Respondents: 6
No response was received from the following Area(s):
CSS
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate CMC poll
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-06-004 Approval to publish CCSDS
914.0-M-2 Cor. 1, Corrigendum 1 to 914.0-M-2, issued September 2015
Results of CESG poll beginning 30 June 2016 and ending 15 July 2016:
Abstain: 0 (0%)
Approve Unconditionally: 5 (100%) (Merri, Shames, Cola, Calzolari, Barton)
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%)
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)
Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):
CSS
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate CMC poll
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
_______________________________________________
CESG-All mailing list
CESG-All at mailman.ccsds.org
https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cesg-all
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg-all/attachments/20160718/03a4d743/attachment.html>
More information about the CESG-All
mailing list