[Cesg-all] CESG Poll Extension

[Thomas Gannett]

Dear CESG Members,

The following CESG poll has been reopened with a due date of 28 July 2016:

- CESG-P-2016-06-001 Approval to release CCSDS 732.1-R-1, Unified 
Space Link Protocol (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review



At 03:54 AM 7/18/2016, Nestor.Peccia at esa.int wrote:
>Dear all
>Results of Poll CESG-P-2016-06-001 Release USLP for Agency Review 
>was wrongly interpreted by the Secretariat
>
>The poll has failed due to lack of quorum
>See Proc & Org YB
>
>I suggest to extend the poll according to section 5.3.5.4.4.3
>
>Ciao
>Nestor
>
>Sent from my iPhone using IBM Verse
>
>
>----------
>On 17 Jul 2016, 23:32:06, thomas.gannett at tgannett.net wrote:
>
>From: thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
>To: cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org
>Cc:
>Date: 17 Jul 2016 23:32:06
>Subject: [Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 15 July 2016
>
>CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-06-001 Approval to release CCSDS
>732.1-R-1, Unified Space Link Protocol (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS
>Agency review
>Results of CESG poll beginning 30 June 2016 and ending 15 July 2016:
>                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
>  Approve Unconditionally:  2 (66.67%) (Merri, Barton)
>  Approve with Conditions:  1 (33.33%) (Shames)
>  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
>CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
>Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions): In reading thru this document
>I have found a number of editorial issues, but for the most part the
>document is in pretty good shape. Most of the identified issues are
>about clarity and presentation, but there are a few editorial issues as well.
>Much of the complexity is due to covering both fixed and variable
>length frames and both TC & TM coding and synch approaches. Likewise
>the inclusion of both COP-1 and COP-P adds complexity that could be
>further worked. I am assuming that a book of this complexity and
>impact may well go through more than one Red Book review, so the WG
>may wish to send it out in its current form to gather a broader set
>of inputs before tackling these issues.
>This is a revised submission following a review of the complete document.
>Total Respondents: 3
>No response was received from the following Area(s):
>CSS
>SLS
>SIS
>SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
>PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after
>conditions have been addressed
>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-06-002 Approval to release CCSDS
>766.2-R-1, Voice and Audio Communications (Red Book, Issue 1) for
>CCSDS Agency review
>Results of CESG poll beginning 30 June 2016 and ending 15 July 2016:
>                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
>  Approve Unconditionally:  3 (60%) (Merri, Cola, Barton)
>  Approve with Conditions:  2 (40%) (Shames, Calzolari)
>  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
>CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
>Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions): This is intended to be an
>CCSDS Blue Book, but it reads more like a cookbook for a small subset
>of agencies. As such it is somewhat off-base in terms of what is
>usually published as a Blue Book, but it likely still serves a useful
>purpose for those who require it.
>However, there are a number of issues with style and accuracy.
>Incorrect references, acronyms used without definitions, lots of
>products identified without references to standards, etc. I marked a
>bunch of them, but not all by any means. I recommend that they be
>fixed before this is sent out to agency review.
>Gian Paolo Calzolari (Approve with Conditions): See attached file.
>NOTE: There can be a general issue of alignment of this book with
>respect to CFDP Blue Book in the sense that this books looks for an
>alignment with CFDP Issue 5 while the CFDP version in force is 4 and
>e.g. it ignores DTN. This may an issue for CESG.
>Total Respondents: 5
>No response was received from the following Area(s):
>CSS
>SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
>PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after
>conditions have been addressed
>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-06-003 Approval to publish CCSDS
>766.1-B-2, Digital Motion Imagery (Blue Book, Issue 2)
>Results of CESG poll beginning 30 June 2016 and ending 15 July 2016:
>                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
>  Approve Unconditionally:  6 (100%) (Merri, Shames, Scott, Cola,
>Calzolari, Barton)
>  Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%)
>  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
>Total Respondents: 6
>No response was received from the following Area(s):
>CSS
>SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
>PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll
>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-06-004 Approval to publish CCSDS
>914.0-M-2 Cor. 1, Corrigendum 1 to 914.0-M-2, issued September 2015
>Results of CESG poll beginning 30 June 2016 and ending 15 July 2016:
>                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
>  Approve Unconditionally:  5 (100%) (Merri, Shames, Cola, Calzolari, Barton)
>  Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%)
>  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)
>Total Respondents: 5
>No response was received from the following Area(s):
>CSS
>SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
>PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll
>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>_______________________________________________
>CESG-All mailing list
>CESG-All at mailman.ccsds.org
>https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cesg-all
>
>
>This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the 
>addressee or addressees only.
>The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either 
>in whole or in part) of its
>content is not permitted.
>If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and 
>delete it from your system.
>Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
>
>Please consider the environment before printing this email.

Thomas Gannett
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
+1 443 472 0805  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg-all/attachments/20160718/91de2ef7/attachment.html>