[Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 15 July 2016

[CCSDS Secretariat]

CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-06-001 Approval to release CCSDS 
732.1-R-1, Unified Space Link Protocol (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS 
Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 30 June 2016 and ending 15 July 2016:

                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
  Approve Unconditionally:  2 (66.67%) (Merri, Barton)
  Approve with Conditions:  1 (33.33%) (Shames)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions): In reading thru this document 
I have found a number of editorial issues, but for the most part the 
document is in pretty good shape. Most of the identified issues are 
about clarity and presentation, but there are a few editorial issues as well.

Much of the complexity is due to covering both fixed and variable 
length frames and both TC & TM coding and synch approaches. Likewise 
the inclusion of both COP-1 and COP-P adds complexity that could be 
further worked. I am assuming that a book of this complexity and 
impact may well go through more than one Red Book review, so the WG 
may wish to send it out in its current form to gather a broader set 
of inputs before tackling these issues.

This is a revised submission following a review of the complete document.


Total Respondents: 3
No response was received from the following Area(s):

CSS
SLS
SIS

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after 
conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-06-002 Approval to release CCSDS 
766.2-R-1, Voice and Audio Communications (Red Book, Issue 1) for 
CCSDS Agency review
Results of CESG poll beginning 30 June 2016 and ending 15 July 2016:

                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
  Approve Unconditionally:  3 (60%) (Merri, Cola, Barton)
  Approve with Conditions:  2 (40%) (Shames, Calzolari)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:

Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions): This is intended to be an 
CCSDS Blue Book, but it reads more like a cookbook for a small subset 
of agencies. As such it is somewhat off-base in terms of what is 
usually published as a Blue Book, but it likely still serves a useful 
purpose for those who require it.

However, there are a number of issues with style and accuracy. 
Incorrect references, acronyms used without definitions, lots of 
products identified without references to standards, etc. I marked a 
bunch of them, but not all by any means. I recommend that they be 
fixed before this is sent out to agency review.

Gian Paolo Calzolari (Approve with Conditions): See attached file. 
NOTE: There can be a general issue of alignment of this book with 
respect to CFDP Blue Book in the sense that this books looks for an 
alignment with CFDP Issue 5 while the CFDP version in force is 4 and 
e.g. it ignores DTN. This may an issue for CESG.


Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

CSS

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll after 
conditions have been addressed

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-06-003 Approval to publish CCSDS 
766.1-B-2, Digital Motion Imagery (Blue Book, Issue 2)
Results of CESG poll beginning 30 June 2016 and ending 15 July 2016:

                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
  Approve Unconditionally:  6 (100%) (Merri, Shames, Scott, Cola, 
Calzolari, Barton)
  Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

Total Respondents: 6
No response was received from the following Area(s):

CSS

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-06-004 Approval to publish CCSDS 
914.0-M-2 Cor. 1, Corrigendum 1 to 914.0-M-2, issued September 2015
Results of CESG poll beginning 30 June 2016 and ending 15 July 2016:

                  Abstain:  0 (0%)
  Approve Unconditionally:  5 (100%) (Merri, Shames, Cola, Calzolari, Barton)
  Approve with Conditions:  0 (0%)
  Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

Total Respondents: 5
No response was received from the following Area(s):

CSS

SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved Unconditionally
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:            Generate CMC poll

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *