[Ccsds-omg-liaison] Initial AB Review of the Cube Sat Reference Model submission
Elisa Kendall
ekendall at thematix.com
Fri Sep 24 17:45:30 UTC 2021
Hi Daniel and all,
I was finalizing my comments when this came in and totally concur with
Manfred, so no need for the duplication. This looks really good,
Daniel, and I'm sure that Dave / INCOSE will be delighted to have this
completed.
With respect to Manfred's comments, I think the right answer is (1)
revise the inventory as he suggests, and (2) if you want to update the
document now (as in prior to a vote to recommend this in the Space DTF
and then in the AB next week) rather than doing so in FTF, the right
approach would be to create an errata for the changes in the document
that is voted on with the original document next week. You can
optionally also create a new convenience document that shows those
changes, but the task force and AB will need to vote on the original
document with the errata.
So - if you want to update the document you'll need two new document
numbers from Juergen - one for the inventory and a second one for the
errata. And IF you choose to do so, a third document number for the new
convenience document.
"See" you next week,
Elisa
On 9/23/2021 12:52 PM, Manfred Koethe wrote:
> Here is my initial AB review of the Cube Sat Reference Model
>
> Before I start ....
> ----------------------
> This has come a loooooooooong way and is now looking really nice,
> thanks to Daniel's substantial effort! Thank you!
>
> A. Machine Readable Files
> -------------------------------------
> The XMI looks fine.
>
> B. Inventory
> -----------------
> The version stamps of the URLs look wrong. The XMI defines a version
> stamp of "20210801" in the CSRM URL, but the Inventory uses
> "20210501". This should be updated to "20210801"
>
> [ luckily for me, I found at least one error :-) ]
>
> C. Document
> ------------------
> General remark:
> - The font of all the «stereotype» mentionings is not consistent.
> - Throughout the document, please insert a blank line after the
> "Gneralization" bulleted lists.
> These, and most of my other comments are EDITORIAL, but I suggeste to
> fix at Beta-1 publishing the latest, as it would be a real pain to fix
> in FTF.
>
> You need to discuss the front page with Michelle and Jason, lots of
> things are in flux there. But I guess there will be a lot more changes
> until the FTF is over....
>
> The OMG address in "Preface - Restricted Rights Legend" needs updating
> [This is an OMG Template Error]
>
> In 7.1.3 MissionNeed - Insert a space between «Mission» and "or by one
> or more ..."
>
> In 7.1.9 ComponentRequirement - shluld the «component» at the end of
> the first line be capitalized? («Component»)?
>
> In 7.1.11 SpaceSegmentRequirement - Inconsitent font size throughout
> the paragraph.
>
> In 7.4.2 Validation - The formating of the "Parameters" list looks odd.
>
> D. Final Question
> -----------------------
> Can a Cube Sat be round …….. ?? ;-)
>
> Manfred
>
> ____________________
> Manfred Koethe
> 88solutions Corporation
> koethe at 88solutions.com <mailto:koethe at 88solutions.com>
> +1 (619) 736-1001
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/ccsds-omg-liaison/attachments/20210924/d9ce5654/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the CCSDS-OMG-Liaison
mailing list