[Sois-tcons] Re: Re:Re: [Sois-tcoa] Re: SpaceOps 2006

[Eduardo W. Bergamini]

Stuart,

I understand that Adrian is expressing to you the best possible approach under CCSDS point-of-view, in a separate message. Should you need any further clarification, please, let us know. Thank you for your inquiry. There is a possibility, yet, that the deadline may be extended. Under discussion, at the moment. Pay attention to it.

Regards,

Eduardo
_________________________________________________________________
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Stuart Fowell 
  To: Eduardo W. Bergamini ; Adrian J. Hooke 
  Cc: James A. Costrell ; sois-tcons at mailman.ccsds.org ; Jean-Marc Soula ; Eduardo Bergamini ; Mike Kearney ; andrew.dowen at jpl.nasa.gov ; sois-tcoa at mailman.ccsds.org 
  Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 9:03 AM
  Subject: RE: Re:Re: [Sois-tcoa] Re: SpaceOps 2006


  Adrian and Eduardo,

  The deadline for abstracts is fast approaching. Have you both reached a consensus on the way forward for SOIS in SpaceOps 2006?

  Regards,

  Stuart



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: sois-tcoa-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org [mailto:sois-tcoa-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Eduardo W. Bergamini
  Sent: 08 November 2005 13:42
  To: Adrian J. Hooke
  Cc: James A. Costrell; sois-tcons at mailman.ccsds.org; Jean-Marc Soula; Eduardo Bergamini; Mike Kearney; andrew.dowen at jpl.nasa.gov; sois-tcoa at mailman.ccsds.org
  Subject: Re: Re:Re: [Sois-tcoa] Re: SpaceOps 2006


  Adrian,

  I understand that the TPC  is considering the possibility that the current Track profile may be, to some  extent, as found pertinent, adapted to the actual suite of submission to be accepted to the event. In counterpart, I would understand that, for instance, the SOIS originated contributions may be eventually passive of being possibly framed in one or more Session blocks and, therefore, in one or more Tracks. But, preferably and, in principle, tightenly characterized as possible to the current context which is currently being defined for each of the Tracks. Otherwise, besides the natural selective process work, the TPC may easily face a burden that may prohibitively delay the review process among the TPC members. I believe you understand what I mean. However, I see as a most positive initiative the prospective SOIS related initiative. Certainly, praiseworthy. Not to mention the other standardization areas possible submissions. Properly explored, CCSDS originated themes do have a respectable, solid potential on hot topics for possible submission.

  Eduardo.
  _________________________________________________
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Adrian J. Hooke 
    To: Eduardo W. Bergamini 
    Cc: Adrian J. Hooke ; sois-tcons at mailman.ccsds.org ; sois-tcoa at mailman.ccsds.org ; 
    andrew.dowen at jpl.nasa.gov ; James A. Costrell ; Mike Kearney ; Jean-Marc Soula ; Jane K. Marquart ; Eduardo Bergamini 
    Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 7:13 PM
    Subject: Re:Re: [Sois-tcoa] Re: SpaceOps 2006


    At 12:36 PM 11/7/2005, Eduardo W. Bergamini wrote:

      One should consider that submissions may have to be framed in more than one track, as part of the natural sorting process. 

    Eduardo: I was suggesting that in view of the unique proximity of key CCSDS personnel, the SpaceOps technical committee might care to introduce a new track - namely, a special session on SOIS interface standardization. Such a "special track" would focus on a "hot topic" and might be of great interest to attendees.

    ///adrian 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sois-tcons/attachments/20051111/52938f60/attachment.html