[Sois-tcons] Re: [Sois-tcoa] Re: SpaceOps 2006

[Jane K. Marquart]

Adrian,

An integrated session sounds like a good idea to me.  Its easier to 
understand the overall picture that way instead of lots of smaller papers 
that one would have to piece together for a clear 
understanding.  I/TCONS/GSFC could support an integrated session however 
you/Stuart need.

Jane
At 05:13 AM 11/7/2005 -0800, Adrian J. Hooke wrote:
>At 03:24 AM 11/7/2005, Stuart Fowell wrote:
>>... I'm not sure we can go for a whole suite of presentations (for this 
>>conference), but I think we could submit something along the lines of the 
>>(still) draft SOIS Green Book, perhaps taking a double presentation slot. 
>>How about the following to give a taster for people:
>>
>>1. Issues and Rational of standardisation of SOIS
>>2. SOIS organisation and WG Charters
>>3. SOIS architectural overview
>>4. TCOAS services
>>5. TCONS services
>>6. OBL services
>>7. BOFs
>>8. Example deployments (to show scalability and flexibility):
>>     Low cost single instrument LEO satellite
>>     Large EO science satellite
>>     Mars robotic mission (lander & rover)
>>9. Current state of standardisation
>>     inc. Red Books status + prototyping efforts
>>10. Conclusions
>
>The subject of spacecraft onboard interface standardization may be 
>interesting enough to organize some kind of tutorial session on this 
>subject, rather than a set of scattered papers.
>
>I've addressed this to some of the SpaceOps program committee members. 
>What would you folks think about an integrated session?
>
>///adrian
>_______________________________________________
>Sois-tcoa mailing list
>Sois-tcoa at mailman.ccsds.org
>http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/sois-tcoa

Jane 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sois-tcons/attachments/20051107/2c5cd915/attachment.html