[cssm] Fw: Correction - CESG Review packs for CDE, SMURF, SPDF and CPIF

Colin Haddow Scotty.Consulting at Scotty-Enterprizes.com
Fri Dec 20 09:27:07 UTC 2024




Dr. Colin R. Haddow

Scotty Consulting UG

________________________________
From: Colin Haddow on behalf of Colin Haddow <Scotty.Consulting at Scotty-Enterprizes.com>
Sent: 20 December 2024 10:26
To: Erik Barkley <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>
Cc: Marcin Gnat <marcin.gnat at dlr.de>
Subject: Correction - CESG Review packs for CDE, SMURF, SPDF and CPIF

Hi Erik,
             apologies, I had created the release in the wrong branch. Now corrected and the link from earlier should now take you to the correct release;


  *   CESG Review GitHub Release: https://github.com/CCSDS-CSSM/902Releases/releases/tag/CESG_Review-20241219<https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/github.com/CCSDS-CSSM/902Releases/releases/tag/CESG_Review-20241219__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!JXjXHR8gV9ljbM0M4d7fre5meFicMV1G7f_WnWPv9vOwVFOZGGOp2fTx1qXQelaEKU1aLkY8vpaykwGYZHVnY31aTw$>

I also checked the links to the GitHub repo in the books and discovered that the hyperlinks in the SMURF and SPDF pointed to the wrong release but the CDE and CPIF one were okay. Don't understand that, but anyway SMURF and SPDF corrected and new packages uploaded which can be found at the following URLs;


  *
SMURF: https://cwe.ccsds.org/css/docs/CSS-SM/CWE%20Private/Book%20Production/Blue/Service%20Management%20Utilization%20Request%20Format%20(SMURF)/Red%20Book/Drafts/902x09r01-SMURF-20241219a-CRH_CESG_Review_Pack.zip


  *
SPDF: https://cwe.ccsds.org/css/docs/CSS-SM/CWE%20Private/Book%20Production/Blue/Service%20Package%20Data%20Formats%20(SPDF)/Red%20Book/Drafts/902x04r01-SPDF-20241219a-CRH_CESG_Review_Pack.zip

With respect to the "Rejected" status in the SPDF I knew there was something I forgotten to put in the e-mail. Having worked thru some examples for the SPDF while working on the BPR SM Level-0 the "Rejected" status doesn't help and is not needed, so I would omit this from the SPDF. Basically the way it was supposed to work was that a "Rejected" request would be reported via the SMASH and a ServicePkgBdy returned that contained no ServicePkgs. The servicePackageStatus attribute is contained in the ServicePkg class and was intended to show what the current status of a particular service package is (bearing in mind that one service package request can result in multiple service packages).

Cheers for now,

Colin



Dr. Colin R. Haddow

Scotty Consulting UG
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20241220/86dc5d36/attachment.htm>


More information about the SMWG mailing list