[Smwg] Re: Simple Schedule Recommendation - Draft Red 1.12.

Tue Jul 28 00:53:13 UTC 2015

Colin,

Thanks very much for the update.   Unfortunately I think  it's not really a separate registry that we want to create but rather the Sites and Apertures registry that we want to create as a minimal intial version of that registry (which will be with further CCSDS registry management policy development). Below is a diagram that is the preliminary definition of the apertures and sites registry as envisioned in the updated registries policy book.  The intention is to define just enough of this for the purposes of SOS book publication, but to not add to the registry "proliferation" problem. To that end, I think the updates needed are a little bit different than what was written up for the Aperture reference.

Attached, please find a proposed SANA registries consideration section update.  There are some consequences to taking the approach in the attached document. While we were working to "flatten" the antenna references, the SANA registry revision effort was moving to accommodate our sites versus apertures concept!  Accordingly this means we actually get to go back to what versions of the book circa mid-May look like (for this item). So it means we get to put back in what was taken out - with the exception of going back to the "antennaRef" vs "apertureRef" - so not a complete wasted effort.  That does mean that the class diagram needs another small tweak and of a minor table update and of course a minor schema change. I think that ultimately this will also accommodate better the CSTS registry needs.  My apologies for the extra effort.

I think if we are okay with the suggested revision (see attached) then we can finally move on to request for CESG poll.

Best regards,

-Erik

[cid:image001.png at 01D0C895.1A81F070]

-----Original Message-----
From: smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org [mailto:smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Colin.Haddow at esa.int
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 4:43 AM
To: CCSDS Service Mgmt WG <smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Cc: Holger.Dreihahn at esa.int
Subject: [Smwg] Re: Simple Schedule Recommendation - Draft Red 1.12.

Dear all,

                  I've just uploaded the latest draft of the Simple Schedule Red Book, this takes into account the change needed to the appertureRef Registry section (E2.4) to reflect that a "Temporary"  SCCS-SM appertureRef registry needs to be created (to later be replaced by the CCSDS Communications Assets registry when that is finalised) and updates section

E2.5 with Erik's suggested test.

I think (hope) that that's all and that Erik can forward it to CESG.

The document can be found at the following URL.

Document:

http://cwe.ccsds.org/css/docs/CSS-SM/CWE%20Private/Schedule%20Format%20-%20xxx%20Book/902x1r1.12.doc

Cheers for now,

Colin

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. Colin R. Haddow,

HSO-GI, European Space Agency,

European Space Operations Centre,

Robert-Bosch-Str 5,

64293 Darmstadt,

Germany.

Phone; +49 6151 90 2896

Fax;      +49 6151 90 3010

E-Mail;  colin.haddow at esa.int<mailto:colin.haddow at esa.int>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.

The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted.

If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.

Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

_______________________________________________

Smwg mailing list

Smwg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:Smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>

http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/smwg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20150728/bb1c23e6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12219 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20150728/bb1c23e6/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: d0-SOS-SANAConsiderations-27-Jul-2015.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 22981 bytes
Desc: d0-SOS-SANAConsiderations-27-Jul-2015.docx
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20150728/bb1c23e6/attachment.docx>