[Smwg] Registries for Simple Schedule. (Our action from yesterdays webex)

[Shames, Peter M (312B)]

Hi Colin,

Strange that you should bring this up.  In the SEA I've been doing some
analysis of the SANA registries just because there are actually already
several "organization" and "person" type registries.  The attached paper
is the proposal that I have drafted to deal with this.

Please take a look and see if this approach, or something like it, will
serve the purpose that you have identified.

Thanks, Peter



On 4/15/15, 6:21 AM, "Colin.Haddow at esa.int" <Colin.Haddow at esa.int> wrote:

>
>Hi John,
>                 currently in the Simple Schedule book the following
>repositories are identified;
>
>   SCCS-SM originatingOrganization
>   SCCS-SM user (which cross-references the SANA Spacecraft Identifiers
>   Registry)
>   SCCS-SM stationAndAntennaRef
>
>Now I've had a look at the SANA procedures yellow book and can't see
>anything
>related to naming conventions so it looks like we're relatively free in
>that
>respect. I've also had a look at what the nav and data archive guys are
>doing
>with thier XML schemas in the registry and they're putting all the schemas
>under one registry (as you're probably aware). This being the case I
>suggest
>the following approach;
>
>for the Schemas we create the following registry;
>
>SCCS-SM Data Entity XML Schemas - this would have the following structure;
>
>File                    Description
>Reference
>The schema file [Type: FILE]  A textual description of the schema purpose
>[Type:: STRING*1024]    Reference number of the appropriate book where the
>schema is defined [Type: STRING*16]
>
>
>for the registries from the Simple Schedule book I'd rename these
>slightly to
>remove the concatenation/camel case (will need a minor edit to the book)
>such
>that these become;
>
>SCCS-SM Originating Organization
>SCCS-SM User
>SCCS-SM Station and Antenna Reference
>
>This approach should be extensible to handle any other registries that  we
>are likely to come up with in the scope of Service Management. Only
>question
>I have (and perhaps Erik and Margherita can comment on this) is whether
>it is
>better to use the Area, rather than the working group as the initial
>identifier (i.e. replace SCCS-SM in the above registry names with CSS).
>The
>latter approach would perhaps be more consistent with maintaining the
>registries/schemas at Area level as has been discussed.
>
>Any thoughts ?
>
>Cheers for now,
>
>Colin
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------------------------------
>
>Dr. Colin R. Haddow,
>HSO-GI, European Space Agency,
>European Space Operations Centre,
>Robert-Bosch-Str 5,
>64293 Darmstadt,
>Germany.
>
>Phone; +49 6151 90 2896
>Fax;      +49 6151 90 3010
>E-Mail;  colin.haddow at esa.int
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------------------------------
>
>
>
>This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the
>addressee or addressees only.
>The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in
>whole or in part) of its
>content is not permitted.
>If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and
>delete it from your system.
>Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the
>sender.
>
>Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Smwg mailing list
>Smwg at mailman.ccsds.org
>http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/smwg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CCSDS Registry Mgmt Policy 20150413.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 749322 bytes
Desc: CCSDS Registry Mgmt Policy 20150413.docx
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20150415/31058171/attachment.docx>