[Sls-rfm] CCSDS RFM-DDOR WG remote discussions - conclusions

[Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int]

Dear All,

thank you for accepting the proposed way forward and acknowledging that 
all the raised comments on the draft REC 2.5.7B were properly accounted 
for.
Please find attached the latest version of white-4 REC 2.5.7B including in 
Annex A the explanatory text on PN registers suggested by Chris and 
incorporated in a note as suggested by Gian Paolo. I only moved it to the 
end of the Annex.

I will accept all revision marks in it, call it RED REC 2.5.7B, and send 
it to agency review along with PINK REC 2.5.6B (same as the pre-PINK 
version) and PINK REC 3.1.6B (as approved in Fall 2019.)

As said many times, discussion on PN registers convention is continuing in 
parallel to the agency review since the issue encompasses other books.

Best Regards, Enrico




----- Forwarded by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA on 29/06/20 09:34 -----

From:   Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA
To:     sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org
Cc:     James.S.Border at jpl.nasa.gov, "Volk, Christopher P (US 335D)" 
<christopher.p.volk at jpl.nasa.gov>, Massimo Bertinelli/estec/ESA at ESA, 
Greg.J.Kazz at jpl.nasa.gov
Date:   22/06/20 11:04
Subject:        CCSDS RFM-DDOR WG remote discussions - proposed 
conclusions for RFM WG endorsement


Dear All,

the input papers concerning draft recommendation 2.5.7B for the Spring 
2020 meeting and the relevant comments received in writing by May 5 
resulted in an in-depth discussion by correspondence between me and Dennis 
with Giovanni's help for the RFM WG, and Jim and Christopher for the DDOR 
WG.

The results are the response document that responds in details to all 
issues raised and the W-4 (GB-EV-JB) version of REC 2.5.7B. Additionally, 
two consequential changes have been agreed by the correspondence group for 
REC 2.5.6B which got the pre-PINK name.

I believe that all raised questions have been responded to (except the PN 
register convention that we agreed to work off line in parallel to the 
agency review of REC 2.5.7B). However, I would like everyone to check the 
attached 3 documents and confirm that his/her issues have been solved 
satisfactory.

In light of the urgency with this (see extract from our AD email below), I 
would kindly ask you to provide me with any disagreements or suggestions 
for improvement you may have by next  Friday, June 26 (close of business 
anywhere you live on Earth.)
If I do not receive any such inputs by June 26, I will submit the 2 
recommendations below to the AD for requesting agency review along with 
what PINK REC 3.1.6B agreed already in Fall 2019. REC 2.5.7B will have all 
revision marks removed and REC 2.5.6B will be called simply PINK.

Best Regards, Enrico



[attachment "Response PN DOR Input Papers and Comments Rev 2-June.docx" 
deleted by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA] 
[attachment "2.5.7.B-W-4 (GB-EV-JB).docx" deleted by Enrico 
Vassallo/esoc/ESA] 
[attachment "pre-PINK REC 2.5.6B.docx" deleted by Enrico 
Vassallo/esoc/ESA] 

______________________

Dear All, 
        I think that some WGs reported planned resolutions to trigger 
Agency Review. 
In this respect please keep in mind that Fall 2020 Meetings is planned to 
start on 26 October. 
Therefore consider that the following (minimum) timing requirement 
a)  One month for CESG + CMC Polls (longer if there are conditions) 
b) Two months for Agency Review. 

This means that - in case you want the agency review closing e.g. mid 
October - the CESG Poll shall start mid July latest. 
And if you want to consider that the CCSDS Technical Editor will need some 
time to check and adapt your docs for the poll then better... hurry up! 

Regards 

Gian Paolo





This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20200629/f8bc711d/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: REC 2.5.7.B-W-4 (final).docx
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 275224 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20200629/f8bc711d/attachment-0001.obj>