[SLS-DC] FW: 124 final version ready for review

[Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int]

Ops. 
I was counting an extra months between September and October. :o)
Sorry, no chance

Gian Paolo

Sent from my iPhone

> On 7. Aug 2021, at 13:38, Thomas Gannett <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> Actually, in order to complete a minimum 60-day agency review prior to October 18, CESG/CMC polling would need to have begun no later than July 16.
>  
> Logothete, L.L.C.
> thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
> +1 443 472 0805
>  
> From: Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int [mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int] 
> Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2021 5:16 AM
> To: Wong, Englin (GSFC-5670)
> Cc: sls-dc at mailman.ccsds.org; Thomas Gannett; Ignacio.Aguilar.Sanchez at esa.int
> Subject: Re: [SLS-DC] FW: 124 final version ready for review
>  
> Just a practical remark for the WG: if you submit the wg resolution at the beginning pf September, you will never get the agency review end before the fall meeting. 
> If the wg has any intention to complete the AR (i.e. having RIDs) before the Fall Meeting then you should issue the eg resolution to AD BEFORE MID AUGUST. 
> 
> I think it is good yo know. 
>  
> Regards
> Gian Paolo
> (Not SLS AD)
>  
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> 
> On 6. Aug 2021, at 23:29, Wong, Englin (GSFC-5670) <mark.wong at nasa.gov> wrote:
> 
> 
>  
> From: David.Evans at esa.int <David.Evans at esa.int> 
> Sent: Friday, August 6, 2021 10:28 AM
> To: sls-dc at mailman.ccsds.org
> Subject: 124 final version ready for review
>  
> Dear working group, 
> 
> The 124 standard has been updated, reviewed and agreed between ESA, CNES and UAB. It is available in pdf and doc on CWE. 
> 
> https://cwe.ccsds.org/sls/docs/SLS-DC/CWE%20Private/124.0-B/advances124_spring_to_fall_2021/124x0w6-22071530.docx?d=wde9feb858ce64ba09aa9e41ce0eee1aa 
> https://cwe.ccsds.org/sls/docs/SLS-DC/CWE%20Private/124.0-B/advances124_spring_to_fall_2021/124x0w6-22071530.pdf 
> 
> The UAB comments and answers and the previous versions are available there as well. 
> 
> Can I ask that any comments the rest of the working group are provided by the end of August. 
> 
> It was agreed at the spring meeting that if no major comments are received then we could start the space agency review process after that point. Therefore I will contact Mark at the beginning of September if there are no more changes.   
> 
> Best regards, 
> Dave 
> 
> PS Note the mailing list address has changed, The old mhdc one has been decommissioned.
> This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
> protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
> this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
> personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).
> This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
> protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
> this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
> personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).

This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-dc/attachments/20210807/d3c30b06/attachment.htm>