[Sis-uce] Thoughts on updating the CFDP Green Books

[Tim Ray]

"should

the state tables and state diagrams (Sections 5 and 6) be updated."

 

The state tables are pretty good as an example of how to implement CFDP.  In
my opinion, they don't need to be updated.  

 

Tim Ray

 

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: sis-uce-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org
[mailto:sis-uce-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Scott Burleigh
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 10:52 PM
To: sis-uce at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: [Sis-uce] Thoughts on updating the CFDP Green Books

 

Hi.  Although the UCE Working Group is extremely close to being

dissolved (just waiting for final approval of the revised Blue Book from

CMC, I believe), it isn't completely out of business yet.  So this might

still be a good venue for discussing a couple of suggestions from Dick

Carper.  In his words:

 

"If you are so inclined, it might be worth having a discussion in your

WG as to whether the GB Part 2 should be continued, should parts of it

be incorporated in Part 1 and Part 2 dropped, and in any case, should

the state tables and state diagrams (Sections 5 and 6) be updated."

 

Any thoughts?

 

Scott

 

 

 

_______________________________________________

Sis-uce mailing list

Sis-uce at mailman.ccsds.org

http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/sis-uce

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sis-uce/attachments/20050920/44c29d3f/attachment.htm