[Sis-uce] Thoughts on updating the CFDP Green Books

[Tim Ray]

Ooops.    Hiro is right.  Please disregard my recent email on this same
subject.

Tim




-----Original Message-----
From: sis-uce-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org
[mailto:sis-uce-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Hiro Miyoshi
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 6:07 AM
To: sis-uce at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: Re: [Sis-uce] Thoughts on updating the CFDP Green Books

Hi Scott,

Scott Burleigh wrote:

> "If you are so inclined, it might be worth having a discussion in your
> WG as to whether the GB Part 2 should be continued, should parts of it
> be incorporated in Part 1 and Part 2 dropped, and in any case, should
> the state tables and state diagrams (Sections 5 and 6) be updated."

  I agree with Dick because UCE modified the former CFDP state 
transitions. State tables and state diagrams should be updated.

Hiro

_______________________________________________
Sis-uce mailing list
Sis-uce at mailman.ccsds.org
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/sis-uce