[Sis-ams] revised AMS concept paper

[Adrian J. Hooke]

At 09:41 AM 6/14/2005, Scott Burleigh wrote:
>Strictly speaking, we're not supposed to be working on document 
>development within a BOF.  I would be glad to hear comments all the same, 
>and meanwhile we need more specifically to be pressing ahead with the 
>proposal to form an AMS Working Group where this sort of discussion really 
>should be taking place.

Scott: you are absolutely correct. If the BOF is converging on a consensus 
that an AMS protocol development is both needed and technically possible, 
then please create a draft Working Group charter as soon as possible and 
present it to the Area Director. We are just about to go into a resource 
allocation process with the CMC and if you want to start a new group, now 
is the time to get a WG chartered.

///adrian

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sis-ams/attachments/20050614/ca07b67b/attachment.html