[Moims-sc] Space Packet binding
Mario.Merri at esa.int
Mario.Merri at esa.int
Wed Mar 18 16:05:59 UTC 2015
Dear Peter,
David has gone through your comments and has proposed dispositions in the
attached files. Most of your points have been accepted. 6 points have been
labelled "to be discussed" and have either a question or a comment
associated.
I would appreciate if you could go through the proposed dispositions,
preferably before the Pasadena meeting, so that we could earmark some time
there to go through any remaining issue face-to-face. Unfortunately, David
will not attend the meeting: nevertheless we could arrange a splinter SM&C
team who could meet with you and David (over a WebEx) to discuss. For
logistic reasons this would be best in the (early) morning. Could you
please identify in your agenda a slot for this next week?
Many thanks
__Mario
From: "Shames, Peter M (312B)" <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
To: "Mario.Merri at esa.int" <Mario.Merri at esa.int>,
Cc: "brigitte.behal at cnes.fr" <brigitte.behal at cnes.fr>,
"danford.s.smith at nasa.gov" <danford.s.smith at nasa.gov>,
"erwann.poupart at cnes.fr" <erwann.poupart at cnes.fr>,
"Mehran.Sarkarati at esa.int" <Mehran.Sarkarati at esa.int>,
"Michael.Wendler at dlr.de" <Michael.Wendler at dlr.de>,
"roger.thompson at scisys.co.uk" <roger.thompson at scisys.co.uk>,
"Sam.Cooper at scisys.co.uk" <Sam.Cooper at scisys.co.uk>,
"Stefan.Gaertner at dlr.de" <Stefan.Gaertner at dlr.de>, David Feliot
<david.feliot at scalagent.com>
Date: 16/03/2015 16:04
Subject: Re: [Moims-sc] Space Packet binding
Dear Mario,
Sorry you are having problems with this. The document is attached again
here. It appears that there was some problem with how I saved the doc,
but I had a second copy with all of the comments intact (see screen shot
of the first such comment).
Please ask me if anything is unclear.
Regards, Peter
From: Mario Merri <Mario.Merri at esa.int>
Date: Monday, March 16, 2015 at 7:53 AM
To: Peter Shames <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
Cc: Brigitte Behal <Brigitte.Behal at cnes.fr>, Dan Smith <
danford.s.smith at nasa.gov>, "erwann.poupart at cnes.fr" <
erwann.poupart at cnes.fr>, "Mehran.Sarkarati at esa.int" <
Mehran.Sarkarati at esa.int>, "Michael.Wendler at dlr.de" <
Michael.Wendler at dlr.de>, Roger Thompson <Roger.Thompson at scisys.co.uk>, "
Sam.Cooper at scisys.co.uk" <Sam.Cooper at scisys.co.uk>, "
Stefan.Gaertner at dlr.de" <Stefan.Gaertner at dlr.de>, David Feliot <
david.feliot at scalagent.com>
Subject: Re: [Moims-sc] Space Packet binding
Dear Peter,
we have tried to access your comments, but unfortunately the pdf does not
include any comment, despite it shows comment-holders. The commented YB is
instead OK. Could you please resend the pdf to this distribution list?
Many thanks,
__Mario
----- Forwarded by Mario Merri/esoc/ESA on 16/03/2015 14:54 -----
From: Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
To: moims-sc at mailman.ccsds.org,
Date: 16/03/2015 13:36
Subject: [Moims-sc] Space Packet binding
Sent by: moims-sc-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org
from P. Shames
SEA AD
Shames Peter
APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS (state conditions that must be satisfied)
http://public.ccsds.org/sites/cwe/cesg/polls/Shared%20Documents/524x1b0_CESG_Approval-SEA.pdf
http://public.ccsds.org/sites/cwe/cesg/polls/Shared%20Documents/MO%20SPP%20Prototype%20Test%20Report-v1-0-ps.doc
This document is vastly improved beyond the original and does a credible
job of providing a rather complete binding from the MAL abstract data
types and message formats to a concrete set of data types and SPP
compliant message formats.
There are, however, still a few loose ends that need to be tied down in
order to ensure interoperability. They are flagged in the document and
listed here:
1) The "mapping configuration parameter" set (Sec 2.4.2 & Annex B) is a
major element in interoperability, but it is listed as a "managed
parameter" handled by some unspecified out of band agreement. Absent a way
to acquire this key document interoperability is impossible.
2) There are several issues in the text that must be corrected, such as
stating that the APID Qualifier, an integer field, is to include a "/"
character, the use of Packet Type" does not align with SPP defined usage,
the handling of security / authentication.
3) The handling of retransmission is left to "lower layers", but many
CCSDS space link protocol deployments do not include such features. Is
reliability, particularly of commanding, to be left to "lower layers",
i.e. "bottom up" or is it a requirement applied by MO operations, top
down?
4) The test report appears to be quite thorough, but one key element
required for interoperability, that pesky "mapping configuration
parameter" set, is not even mentioned. Also, the details of the test
configuration leave a lot to the imagination and it is not clear how
anyone other than those involved in the test could insert their own MAL /
SPP component and test it out. See notes on test report for more details.
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee
or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in
whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete
it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the
sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
_______________________________________________
Moims-sc mailing list
Moims-sc at mailman.ccsds.org
http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/moims-sc
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee
or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in
whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete
it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the
sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee
or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in
whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete
it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the
sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
[attachment "524x1b0_CESG_Approval-SEA1.pdf" deleted by Mario
Merri/esoc/ESA] [attachment "Screen Shot 2015-03-16 at 8.03.13 AM.png"
deleted by Mario Merri/esoc/ESA]
[attachment "ATT00001.gif" deleted by Mario Merri/esoc/ESA]
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-sc/attachments/20150318/0b7ca6f7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 807 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-sc/attachments/20150318/0b7ca6f7/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 524x1b0_CESG_Approval-SEA1-PS comments with responses-18mar2015.xls
Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
Size: 23040 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-sc/attachments/20150318/0b7ca6f7/attachment.xls>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: MO SPP Prototype Test Report-v1-0-PS comments with responses-18mar2015.xls
Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
Size: 12800 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-sc/attachments/20150318/0b7ca6f7/attachment-0001.xls>
More information about the MOIMS-SC
mailing list