[Moims-ipr] Re: [Moims-dai] Re: CESG RESOLUTION: "Panel-2" Document Reaffirmation (CESG-03 -013)

[John Garrett]

Hi,

My personal opinion is that we have a lot of data at NSSDC in the archive 
in SFDU format.
We expect that data to remain in that format for the next 20-50 years.  So 
I  would like for the standards to remain standards.

Using IETF as a model, IP remains a standard even though IPv6 has been 
available for many years and is preferred over IP.  This is the model that 
we should use for the SFDU standards remaining standards even with our 
creation of an XFDU standard which should replace the SFDU standards for 
new work.

I'm concerned about the damage we are starting to do to the reputation of 
CCSDS standards if we start converting all CCSDS standards to "historical" 
status in under 10 years.  Many project life cycles are longer than 
that.   Why will they pick up CCSDS standards when they expect the 
organization promoting them will consider them obsolete while the project 
is still active?

Cheers,
-JOhn





At 04:19 PM 12/3/2003 +0100, Nestor.Peccia@esa.int wrote:
>Don, Lou, Patrick, David, Claude & all.
>
>I would like a consolidated response from the WG
>
>ciao
>nestor
>
>Please let me know your position
>----- Forwarded by Nestor Peccia/esoc/ESA on 03/12/2003 16:12 -----
>|--------+----------------------------->
>|        |          "Adrian J. Hooke"  |
>|        |          <adrian.j.hooke@jpl|
>|        |          .nasa.gov>         |
>|        |                             |
>|        |          02/12/2003 21:48   |
>|        |                             |
>|--------+----------------------------->
> 
 > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>   | 
 >     |
>   |       To:     "Nestor Peccia" 
> <nestor.peccia@esa.int>                     |
>   |       cc:     CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - 
> ADs                      |
>   |       <cesg@mailman.ccsds.org>, 
> secretariat@mailman.ccsds.org             |
>   |       Subject:     Re: CESG RESOLUTION: "Panel-2" Document 
> Reaffirmation  |
>   |       (CESG-03-013) 
 >     |
> 
 > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>
>
>
>
>At 09:57 AM 12/2/2003, T. Gannett wrote:
>      Subject: CESG RESOLUTION CESG-03-013, Panel-2 Document Reaffirmation
>      MC-E03-07.  The CCSDS resolves to reaffirm the following documents for a
>      period of two years:
>      -       ASCII Encoded English, CCSDS 643.0-B-1, IS14962
>      -       SFDU Structure and Construction Rules, CCSDS 620.0-B-2, IS12175
>      -       SFDU Referencing Environment, CCSDS 622.0-B-1, IS15888
>      -       SFDU Control Authority Procedures, CCSDS 630.0-B-1, IS13764
>      -       SFDU Control Authority Data Structures, CCSDS 632.0-B-1, IS15395
>      Result: Eight of ten CCSDS Member Agencies responded to affirm the 
> proposed
>      resolution.  One Member Agency, RSA, did not respond but is presumed 
> not to
>      disagree.  One Member Agency, DLR, affirmed with the following 
> qualifier:
>      "Agreed, but: within these two years an analysis shall take place if 
> these
>      recommendations are used by all agencies and if they are state of 
> the art.
>      It might be useful to tranfer thuse documents to the 'Historical' after
>      that."
>      The resolution is therefore adopted with an action on the CESG to 
> conduct
>      the analyses indicated in the DLR comment.
>
>Nestor:
>
>Please respond with an appropriate recommended action (such as a proposed WG
>charter modification?) to execute the analysis as requested by the Management
>Council.
>
>Best regards
>Adrian
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Moims-dai mailing list
>Moims-dai@mailman.ccsds.org
>http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai