[Moims-ipr] Re: [Moims-dai] Re: CESG RESOLUTION: "Panel-2" Document Reaffirmation (CESG-03-013)

[Donald M. Sawyer]

Nestor,

I agree with John Garrett's response.  These documents are in use
and there is no a priori reason to give them an early designation
as 'historical'.  For example, they will be part of NSSDC's
Archival Information Packages for the forseable future, even if
we adopt a new packaging structure for newer arriving data.

We should, therefore, reject the notion to do any type of further
analysis on their usefulness on some pre-defined schedule, apart from the 
usual 5-year review for ISO documents.  It would be a waste of
time and effort, especially to make this a 'charter issue'. I
believe Claude's response is also consistent with this approach.

For your response, I would suggest pointing out that these standards
are being used and will be over at least the next five years.
Therefore the analysis has already been done and they should
come up again for review in the normal 5-year review cycle. 

Don

Nestor.Peccia@esa.int wrote:
> 
> Don, Lou, Patrick, David, Claude & all.
> 
> I would like a consolidated response from the WG
> 
> ciao
> nestor
> 
> Please let me know your position
> ----- Forwarded by Nestor Peccia/esoc/ESA on 03/12/2003 16:12 -----
> |--------+----------------------------->
> |        |          "Adrian J. Hooke"  |
> |        |          <adrian.j.hooke@jpl|
> |        |          .nasa.gov>         |
> |        |                             |
> |        |          02/12/2003 21:48   |
> |        |                             |
> |--------+----------------------------->
>   >---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>   |                                                                           |
>   |       To:     "Nestor Peccia" <nestor.peccia@esa.int>                     |
>   |       cc:     CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - ADs                      |
>   |       <cesg@mailman.ccsds.org>, secretariat@mailman.ccsds.org             |
>   |       Subject:     Re: CESG RESOLUTION: "Panel-2" Document Reaffirmation  |
>   |       (CESG-03-013)                                                       |
>   >---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> 
> At 09:57 AM 12/2/2003, T. Gannett wrote:
>      Subject: CESG RESOLUTION CESG-03-013, Panel-2 Document Reaffirmation
>      MC-E03-07.  The CCSDS resolves to reaffirm the following documents for a
>      period of two years:
>      -       ASCII Encoded English, CCSDS 643.0-B-1, IS14962
>      -       SFDU Structure and Construction Rules, CCSDS 620.0-B-2, IS12175
>      -       SFDU Referencing Environment, CCSDS 622.0-B-1, IS15888
>      -       SFDU Control Authority Procedures, CCSDS 630.0-B-1, IS13764
>      -       SFDU Control Authority Data Structures, CCSDS 632.0-B-1, IS15395
>      Result: Eight of ten CCSDS Member Agencies responded to affirm the proposed
>      resolution.  One Member Agency, RSA, did not respond but is presumed not to
>      disagree.  One Member Agency, DLR, affirmed with the following qualifier:
>      "Agreed, but: within these two years an analysis shall take place if these
>      recommendations are used by all agencies and if they are state of the art.
>      It might be useful to tranfer thuse documents to the 'Historical' after
>      that."
>      The resolution is therefore adopted with an action on the CESG to conduct
>      the analyses indicated in the DLR comment.
> 
> Nestor:
> 
> Please respond with an appropriate recommended action (such as a proposed WG
> charter modification?) to execute the analysis as requested by the Management
> Council.
> 
> Best regards
> Adrian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Moims-dai mailing list
> Moims-dai@mailman.ccsds.org
> http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai