[Moims-dai] Reminder of Skype call Tuesday

Mon Mar 15 14:23:54 UTC 2021

Meeting: 10:00 Tuesday (Washington DC time), but because of Daylight Saving
Time changes the time for the meeting in Europe will be 1400 UK time, 1500
Paris time this week and next week. After that Europe also moves to Daylight
Saving Time and we return to the normal schedule.

If you do not receive a notification from Skype then please join it by
clicking the link:

 <https://join.skype.com/ykyu5SIPhSnD> https://join.skype.com/ykyu5SIPhSnD

*Don't have Skype yet? Download it before you join  <https://www.skype.com>
https://www.skype.com

I may not be able to make the start of this meeting so please start without
me and do not wait for me.

Draft agenda:

1.	Feedback from MOIMS AD on books  I received the following rapid
response from Marc Duhaze. I think there are just a few things arising 
please check.

Hi All,

First of all, Im a newbie in this domain, so please be tolerant ;)

About CCSDS 652.1-M-2-updated :

*	As it is mainly a clone of the ISO/IEC 17021-1 standard fitted in a
CCSDS template,

*	I have no specific comment, so its fine for me

About CCSDS 653.0-R-1 :

*	Initial page : reference should be CCSDS 653.0-R-1, no ?

*	About Brigitte comment : p3-1 

*	I would have expected a more "in depth" analysis of the project
documentation that should be preserved at each phase.
*	David answer : Yes, specific aspects of the project documentation
will almost certainly be preserved

*	Im not sure about what was expected by Brigitte and so if David
answers the question, however my opinion is that a lot of examples of
possible project documents are given for each step of the collection
group. So I assume that at the end of a phase, all the document produced
during the different steps of a collection group are preserved. So to answer
the Brigitte question, you should perhaps add a sentence in that way, at the
end of §3.2 

*	About Mario comment : p4-4

*	All information in the PDI are already described in the OAIS book
at high level. In my understanding, the value of this book should be in
going one level down and prescribe, for each PDI, the minimum common
denominator of required information...
*	David answer : The point is that PDI, and in particular Provenance,
is to be collected throughout, rather than left to the end. In OAIS this is
implicit. This document makes it explicit.

*	Im not sure the answer covers the question raised by Mario. Is it
possible to split the information list provided for each type (Reference,
Provenance, Context, 
) into different categories such as  required
information, recommended information, optional information 
 ?

*	I agree with other answers to Mario and Brigitte comments and have
no other comment

About CCSDS 652.0-W(M)-1.1 :

*	Page 1-5 : you missed a written : Preservation Strategic Plan: A
written statement
  to change to 
documented statement
*	About Mario comment : p3-5

*	This seems to me a characteristic of any good work position. I
would remove it from here. By the same token, you could also ask for full
medical coverage for the repository staff, 

*	David answer We disagree. Our experience is that it is worth statin
this metric explicitly.  If one goes down the route you propose we could
remove most metrics

*	Sorry Mario ;) , but I agree with David answer. @Mario, what about
you ?

*	About Brigitte comments p5-1 and 5-11

*       BBh34: besides adapting and changing its hardware and software, it
seems to me that the repository architecture should be designed so that it
can cope with these changes with a minimum of service perturbation (for
instance having dedicated test environment to validate new software release
and to train staff, provide possibilities of roll-back when installing new
version, privilege whenever possible backward compatibility).

If the repository architecture is not correctly dimensioned, any
intervention will lead to more or less important service interruptions.

Consider adding a requirement/metric dedicated to this issue (the
architecture must be designed and dimensioned to meet the preservation
objectives).

*       David answer  It was felt that, while what you write is correct, it
seemed unnecessary to demand that auditors review the overall design of the
archive, but the system requirement/design documents may be presented as
evidence

*	BBh39: cf. BBh34. Prior to that, the repository architecture should
be adequately dimensioned
*	David answer : Metrics covering adequate scaling already in the
document

*	To me, the points raised by Brigitte are covered by exiting
requirements in the document such as 

*	The repository shall identify and manage the risks to its
preservation operations and goals associated with system infrastructure.
*	The repository shall have adequate hardware and software support
for backup functionality sufficient for maintaining the system support to
preserve the repository content and tracking repository functions.   

*	I agree with other answers to Mario and Brigitte comments and have
no other comment

Regards.

Marc.

2.	OAIS  please add comments to OPEN OAIS RIDS, especially about DOI
and FAIR. It would be good to close these to the point of asking for being
able to ask for the agreement of the submitter.

322 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=322>  

OAIS Jun 

Section 

2 

		Clarify usefulness of OAIS for Interoperability,
re-reproducibility and re-use  <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=322>

The requirements for preservation are also important for current use of
information. This change will make that point clearer. 

--- 

325 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=325>  

OAIS Jun 

Section: 

9 

		NASA/JSC 1 Only one set of access rights per data object
<http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=325> 

Access control enforcement will be greatly simplified. 

--- 

326 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=326>  

OAIS Jun 

Section: 

2 

		INPE-1:Detailed review be made of Figure A-1 in page A-2 in
order that it may guaranteed that the functionally that it represents
-fully- corresponds to the naturally more detailed functionality that is
represented in the set of Figures 4-2 through 4-7.
<http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=326> 

he author of this proposal, for transforming it in a Brazilian Standard
(ABNT/BR) had to translate to the Portuguese the previous OAIS document ISO
14721:2012, which contains the document CCSDS 650.0-M-2. The proposal being
made in this current RID ha... 

--- 

327 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=327>  

OAIS Jun 

Section 

1 

		INPE-2: Cross-reference glossary term to first use
<http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=327> 

The author of this proposal, for transforming it in a Brazilian Standard
(ABNT/BR) had to translate to the Portuguese the previous OAIS document ISO
14721:2012, which contains the document CCSDS 650.0-M-2. The proposal being
made in this current RID h... 

--- 

328 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=328>  

OAIS Jun 

Section 

1 

		INPE-3: Check that there are no missing DEFINITION(s) of
ACRONYM(s) or ABBREVIATION(s)  <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=328>

The author of this proposal, for transforming it in a Brazilian Standard
(ABNT/BR) had to translate to the Portuguese the previous OAIS document ISO
14721:2012, which contains the document CCSDS 650.0-M-2. The proposal being
made in this current RID h... 

--- 

329 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=329>  

OAIS Jun 

Section 

1 

		ESA - Definition of Persistent and Unique Identifiers
<http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=329> 

Missing definitions 

--- 

330 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=330>  

OAIS Jun 

Section 

1 

		ESA-CA-01 Rotate Fig 4-29
<http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=330> 

Consistency with other OAIS figures 

--- 

331 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=331>  

OAIS Jun 

Section 

1 

		ESA-CA-02 Make references to FAIR
<http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=331> 

Beneficial to add reference to FAIR 

--- 

332 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=332>  

OAIS Jun 

Section 

1 

		ESA-CA-03 Make reference to DOI
<http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=332> 

Reference to DOIs 

--- 

3.	OAIS-IF

a.	Steve has sent out updated diagram - this is the main topic for
discussion
b.	To start the action from last week to provide more details for the
Provenance Interface see the attached Draft detailed interfaces including
details of the operations for a selection of the interfaces  this is just a
sample to check the content.  The style will have to be changed in the final
version.
c.	The last version of the draft GB is
https://www.dropbox.com/s/oze4kbj9z7rn9fk/OAIS-IF%20Rationale%20Scenarios%20
and%20Requirements-20210227.docx?dl=0 . This gives a clearer idea of how I
think the multi-archive access would work  this is in the updated section
2.3 and added most of Robertas comments.

Comments and alternatives welcome. This document is probably about  as
complete as I want to make it without some detailed feedback, positive or
negative, from the group. 

..David

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-dai/attachments/20210315/9597cf2c/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Draft detailed interfaces.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 540166 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-dai/attachments/20210315/9597cf2c/attachment-0001.docx>