[Moims-dai] Notes from meeting 20210309

Tue Mar 9 16:43:59 UTC 2021

Present: DG, Luke, Raman, Felix, Eld, Steve, Mark, Mike, Terry, John
(apologies if I missed someone)

1.	Feedback from MOIMS AD on books

a.	Mario said that the document's had "slipped through the cracks" but
hoped the AD reviews will happen soon.
b.	ACTION: DG and JGG: remind secretariat about OAIS ISO review

2.	OAIS - please add comments to OPEN OAIS RIDS, especially about DOI
and FAIR

322 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=322>  

OAIS Jun 

Section 

2 

		Clarify usefulness of OAIS for Interoperability,
re-reproducibility and re-use  <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=322>

The requirements for preservation are also important for current use of
information. This change will make that point clearer. 

--- 

325 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=325>  

OAIS Jun 

Section: 

9 

		NASA/JSC 1 Only one set of access rights per data object
<http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=325> 

Access control enforcement will be greatly simplified. 

--- 

326 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=326>  

OAIS Jun 

Section: 

2 

		INPE-1:Detailed review be made of Figure A-1 in page A-2 in
order that it may guaranteed that the functionally that it represents
-fully- corresponds to the naturally more detailed functionality that is
represented in the set of Figures 4-2 through 4-7.
<http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=326> 

he author of this proposal, for transforming it in a Brazilian Standard
(ABNT/BR) had to translate to the Portuguese the previous OAIS document ISO
14721:2012, which contains the document CCSDS 650.0-M-2. The proposal being
made in this current RID ha... 

--- 

327 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=327>  

OAIS Jun 

Section 

1 

		INPE-2: Cross-reference glossary term to first use
<http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=327> 

The author of this proposal, for transforming it in a Brazilian Standard
(ABNT/BR) had to translate to the Portuguese the previous OAIS document ISO
14721:2012, which contains the document CCSDS 650.0-M-2. The proposal being
made in this current RID h... 

--- 

328 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=328>  

OAIS Jun 

Section 

1 

		INPE-3: Check that there are no missing DEFINITION(s) of
ACRONYM(s) or ABBREVIATION(s)  <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=328>

The author of this proposal, for transforming it in a Brazilian Standard
(ABNT/BR) had to translate to the Portuguese the previous OAIS document ISO
14721:2012, which contains the document CCSDS 650.0-M-2. The proposal being
made in this current RID h... 

--- 

329 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=329>  

OAIS Jun 

Section 

1 

		ESA - Definition of Persistent and Unique Identifiers
<http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=329> 

Missing definitions 

--- 

330 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=330>  

OAIS Jun 

Section 

1 

		ESA-CA-01 Rotate Fig 4-29
<http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=330> 

Consistency with other OAIS figures 

--- 

331 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=331>  

OAIS Jun 

Section 

1 

		ESA-CA-02 Make references to FAIR
<http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=331> 

Beneficial to add reference to FAIR 

--- 

332 <http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=332>  

OAIS Jun 

Section 

1 

		ESA-CA-03 Make reference to DOI
<http://review.oais.info/show_bug.cgi?id=332> 

Reference to DOIs 

--- 

ACTION: All to review the RIDS and make comments if possible.

3.	OAIS-IF

a.	Steve has sent out updated diagram - this is the main topic for
discussion

                                                               i.
ACTION: SH to update draft WB

                                                             ii.
ACTION: DG will provide some details for some of the interfaces e.g.
Provenance etc

b.	The last version of the draft GB is
https://www.dropbox.com/s/oze4kbj9z7rn9fk/OAIS-IF%20Rationale%20Scenarios%20
and%20Requirements-20210227.docx?dl=0 . This gives a clearer idea of how I
think the multi-archive access would work - this is in the updated section
2.3 and added most of Roberta's comments.

Comments and alternatives welcome. This document is probably about  as
complete as I want to make it without some detailed feedback, positive or
negative, from the group. 

Barbara had written about FAIR:
<https://digitalpreservation.nl/seeds/why-reinventing-the-wheel-for-fair/>
https://digitalpreservation.nl/seeds/why-reinventing-the-wheel-for-fair/

Roberta's chat entry was:

Sorry I have to leave the interesting discussion. As I promised one week
ago, please find the link to the current new AGID Technical Rules, with on
page 6 the reference to ISO16363
https://www.agid.gov.it/sites/default/files/repository_files/allegato_4_stan
dard_e_specifiche_tecniche.pdf

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-dai/attachments/20210309/5d80354a/attachment.htm>