[Css-rasg] RE: RASIG/SM+C Overlap Telecon #1 Notes

Barkley, Erik J (317H) erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov
Fri Sep 24 03:00:28 EDT 2010


Mario,

Thanks very much for the comments.   Re Rec ID 1:  Glossary update and maintenance - agree and I will update this in the spreadsheet.

Re Rec ID 2:  I will see what I can do about the timeframe question.  Obviously sooner is better, but, as we know, resources are not exactly plentiful in CCSDS so I will have to check with the membership of SMWG and see what seems reasonable/feasible.  Consider this an action on my part.

Best regards,

-Erik

From: Mario.Merri at esa.int [mailto:Mario.Merri at esa.int]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 9:31 PM
To: Barkley, Erik J (317H)
Cc: 'Colin.Haddow at esa.int'; CCSDS RA SIG; Leo.Hartman at asc-csa.gc.ca; Nestor.Peccia at esa.int; Shames, Peter M (313B); roger.thompson at scisys.co.uk; Sam.Cooper at scisys.co.uk
Subject: Re: RASIG/SM+C Overlap Telecon #1 Notes


My comments:

Rec. ID 1
I believe we agreed that on one hand CCSDS has "domain-specific" terminology (e.g. telemetry, return services) which must be preserved. On the other hand, when the terminology overlaps with more generic domains (e.g. services) where the industry standards are worldwide consolidated, we should give preference the these in order to make the CCSDS specifications clearer and unambiguous. We also agreed that the revamping of CCSDS glossary is a very much needed activity which should provide a set of unambiguous terms that are used across CCSDS specs and that should be maintained under configuration control. Clearly, we are not there yet and a, once the glossary will be available, a long-term plan should be made so that all specs could be migrated to use consistent terminology.

Rec. ID 2
I know that we have not discussed at the telecon, but it would be nice to time-frame the agreed exercise to test MAL as a re-factoring technology for SM.

Ciao

__Mario

From:

"Barkley, Erik J (317H)" <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>

To:

"'Mario.Merri at esa.int'" <Mario.Merri at esa.int>, "Shames, Peter M (313B)" <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Sam.Cooper at scisys.co.uk" <Sam.Cooper at scisys.co.uk>, "Leo.Hartman at asc-csa.gc.ca" <Leo.Hartman at asc-csa.gc.ca>

Cc:

CCSDS RA SIG <CSS-RASG at mailman.ccsds.org>, "Nestor.Peccia at esa.int" <Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>, "'Colin.Haddow at esa.int'" <Colin.Haddow at esa.int>, "roger.thompson at scisys.co.uk" <roger.thompson at scisys.co.uk>

Date:

24/09/2010 02:21

Subject:

RASIG/SM+C Overlap Telecon #1 Notes


________________________________



CCSDS Colleagues,

Following is a brief summary with regard to our teleconference on Wednesday, 22 September 2010.  The bulk of the teleconference conclusions have been captured in the summaries on the Excel spreadsheet (under the column "draft conclusions"). Obviously this is just my take so please provide corrections as you deem necessary.

Best regards,

-Erik

---Telecon Summary---

Attendees:  S. Cooper, M. Merri, L. Hartman, P. Shames, E. Barkley

Topics discussed:
                Overlaps and SEA AD Recommendations -- see updated spreadsheet
                ExoMars Architecture - key personnel not available for update
                Telecon Schedule prior to London - two more telecons to be arranged (done)
                London face-to-face meeting - agreed to meeting Tue AM the week of the meetings


 [attachment "d1-SMC-OverlapSolutions-23-Sep-2010.xls" deleted by Mario Merri/esoc/ESA]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/css-rasg/attachments/20100924/56fcd4ad/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the CSS-RASG mailing list