[Css-rasg] RE: RASIG/SM+C Overlap Telecon #1 Notes

[Mario.Merri at esa.int]

Erik,

not to be pedant, but my point on Red ID 1 was more than just the 
glossary. Do you agree with the entire point as described in my email 
below?

Ciao

__Mario



From:
"Barkley, Erik J (317H)" <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>
To:
"Mario.Merri at esa.int" <Mario.Merri at esa.int>
Cc:
"'Colin.Haddow at esa.int'" <Colin.Haddow at esa.int>, CCSDS RA SIG 
<CSS-RASG at mailman.ccsds.org>, "Leo.Hartman at asc-csa.gc.ca" 
<Leo.Hartman at asc-csa.gc.ca>, "Nestor.Peccia at esa.int" 
<Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>, "Shames, Peter M (313B)" 
<peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, "roger.thompson at scisys.co.uk" 
<roger.thompson at scisys.co.uk>, "Sam.Cooper at scisys.co.uk" 
<Sam.Cooper at scisys.co.uk>
Date:
24/09/2010 09:00
Subject:
RE: RASIG/SM+C Overlap Telecon #1 Notes



Mario,
 
Thanks very much for the comments.   Re Rec ID 1:  Glossary update and 
maintenance ? agree and I will update this in the spreadsheet.
 
Re Rec ID 2:  I will see what I can do about the timeframe question. 
Obviously sooner is better, but, as we know, resources are not exactly 
plentiful in CCSDS so I will have to check with the membership of SMWG and 
see what seems reasonable/feasible.  Consider this an action on my part.
 
Best regards,
 
-Erik
 
From: Mario.Merri at esa.int [mailto:Mario.Merri at esa.int] 
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 9:31 PM
To: Barkley, Erik J (317H)
Cc: 'Colin.Haddow at esa.int'; CCSDS RA SIG; Leo.Hartman at asc-csa.gc.ca; 
Nestor.Peccia at esa.int; Shames, Peter M (313B); 
roger.thompson at scisys.co.uk; Sam.Cooper at scisys.co.uk
Subject: Re: RASIG/SM+C Overlap Telecon #1 Notes
 

My comments: 

Rec. ID 1 
I believe we agreed that on one hand CCSDS has "domain-specific" 
terminology (e.g. telemetry, return services) which must be preserved. On 
the other hand, when the terminology overlaps with more generic domains 
(e.g. services) where the industry standards are worldwide consolidated, 
we should give preference the these in order to make the CCSDS 
specifications clearer and unambiguous. We also agreed that the revamping 
of CCSDS glossary is a very much needed activity which should provide a 
set of unambiguous terms that are used across CCSDS specs and that should 
be maintained under configuration control. Clearly, we are not there yet 
and a, once the glossary will be available, a long-term plan should be 
made so that all specs could be migrated to use consistent terminology. 

Rec. ID 2 
I know that we have not discussed at the telecon, but it would be nice to 
time-frame the agreed exercise to test MAL as a re-factoring technology 
for SM. 

Ciao 

__Mario 


From: 
"Barkley, Erik J (317H)" <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov> 
To: 
"'Mario.Merri at esa.int'" <Mario.Merri at esa.int>, "Shames, Peter M (313B)" 
<peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Sam.Cooper at scisys.co.uk" 
<Sam.Cooper at scisys.co.uk>, "Leo.Hartman at asc-csa.gc.ca" 
<Leo.Hartman at asc-csa.gc.ca> 
Cc: 
CCSDS RA SIG <CSS-RASG at mailman.ccsds.org>, "Nestor.Peccia at esa.int" 
<Nestor.Peccia at esa.int>, "'Colin.Haddow at esa.int'" <Colin.Haddow at esa.int>, 
"roger.thompson at scisys.co.uk" <roger.thompson at scisys.co.uk> 
Date: 
24/09/2010 02:21 
Subject: 
RASIG/SM+C Overlap Telecon #1 Notes
 




CCSDS Colleagues, 
  
Following is a brief summary with regard to our teleconference on 
Wednesday, 22 September 2010.  The bulk of the teleconference conclusions 
have been captured in the summaries on the Excel spreadsheet (under the 
column "draft conclusions"). Obviously this is just my take so please 
provide corrections as you deem necessary. 
  
Best regards, 
  
-Erik 
  
---Telecon Summary--- 
  
Attendees:  S. Cooper, M. Merri, L. Hartman, P. Shames, E. Barkley 
  
Topics discussed: 
                Overlaps and SEA AD Recommendations -- see updated 
spreadsheet 
                ExoMars Architecture ? key personnel not available for 
update 
                Telecon Schedule prior to London ? two more telecons to be 
arranged (done) 
                London face-to-face meeting ? agreed to meeting Tue AM the 
week of the meetings 
  
  
 [attachment "d1-SMC-OverlapSolutions-23-Sep-2010.xls" deleted by Mario 
Merri/esoc/ESA] 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/css-rasg/attachments/20100924/c8468164/attachment.htm