[Css-csts] RE: deprecated production-status parameter?

[Yves.Doat at esa.int]

Dear John,
You are right, in the Return Framework, the parameter "production-status" 
doe not exist in the ASN.1. Considering that the forward procedures are 
coming and will re-introduce the parameter, I would appreciate to limit 
the impact in the book.

I therefore propose to change the font from "identifier" to "normal" 
throughout the document. Having changed the font implies that the 
parameter "production-status" referred in the document is not defined in 
ASN.1.
The events related to the various values of the production status: 
productionConfigured, productionInterrupted, productionHalted and 
productionOperational remain valid and are still defined in sections 
3.10.2.2.3 (NOTIFY operation) and in C7 (Object Identifiers of the 
events).

Please let me know if you would agree to this minimum change.

Best regards
Yves


From:
"John Pietras" <john.pietras at gst.com>
To:
<Yves.Doat at esa.int>
Cc:
<css-csts at mailman.ccsds.org>
Date:
08/08/2012 16:08
Subject:
RE: deprecated production-status parameter?



Yves,
My comment about the embedded note ?2012 not valid anymore? applied to the 
June draft of the CSTS FW ? it (and the associated ASN.1 ProductionStatus 
type definition) have been deleted from the July version. However, my 
comments about references to the production-status parameter throughout 
the book are still valid.
 
Best regards,
John
 
From: John Pietras 
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 4:58 PM
To: Yves.Doat at esa.int
Cc: CCSDS_CSTSWG (css-csts at mailman.ccsds.org)
Subject: deprecated production-status parameter?
 
Yves,
There are a number of citations of and references to the production-status 
parameter, where ?production-status? has the courier font that indicates 
that it is a formal parameter of the Framework. For example, section 
2.2.10.2 states:
?The status of the service production resource is reported by means of the 
production-status parameter and is made available to all service instances 
accessing the same production resource.  The CSTS Specification Framework 
defines the permissible values of production-status and the transitions 
between these values in abstract terms; these values may be refined by 
service specifications based on the Framework.  Service specifications may 
also define substates for one or more of the production-status values 
where appropriate.?
 
However, when I went and actually looked for productionStatus in the 
ASN.1, I found that D3.3, Cross Support Transfer Service ?COMMON TYPES, 
exports ProductionStatus but that the type itself now has the annotation 
?201206 Not valid anymore?.
 
If indeed production-status is now not a formal parameter type then I 
think it should be cleaned up in the Framework to remove those statemetns 
that say that it is. However, I don?t thinkn that it is important enough 
to delay Red-2 publication just for that. This comment can be treated as 
the first RID against Red-2.
 
Best regards,
John
 
John Pietras
GST, Inc.
7855 Walker Drive, Suite 200
Greenbelt, MD 20770
240-542-1155
 


This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/css-csts/attachments/20120816/7294ad4c/attachment.html