[Css-csts] RE: "monitoring parameters" in Cyclic Report procedure

John Pietras john.pietras at gst.com
Tue May 5 07:58:23 EDT 2009


Yves,
Your replacement sentence is better. Thanks.

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Yves.Doat at esa.int [mailto:Yves.Doat at esa.int] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 4:15 AM
To: John Pietras
Cc: css-csts at mailman.ccsds.org; Fred Brosi; John Pietras
Subject: Re: "monitoring parameters" in Cyclic Report procedure

John,
I also noticed the issue and rephrased as follows:
"The TRANSFER-DATA shall be refined as required in 3.9.2.4.2 to carry
the
selected parameters (names, type, value and qualifier) using the
Qualified-Parameter parameter (see annex B)."
Is that Ok for you?
Regards
Yves


 

             "John Pietras"

             <john.pietras at gst.

             com>
To 
                                        <Yves.Doat at esa.int>

             04/05/2009 21:02
cc 
                                        <css-csts at mailman.ccsds.org>,

                                        <Fred.Brosi at gst.com>, "John
Pietras" 
                                        <john.pietras at gst.com>

 
Subject 
                                        "monitoring parameters" in
Cyclic    
                                        Report procedure

 

 

 

 

 

 





Yves,
I just noticed something that had slipped by me before - in CSTS
Framework
R-0.18, the description of the Transfer-Data operation for the Cyclic
Report
procedure (section 4.7.3.2) contain the new (as or R-0.18) sentence "The
TRANSFER-DATA is refined as required in 3.9.2.4.2 to carry the
monitoring
parameters (names and values)."  Since the Cyclic Report procedure is
supposed to be broader than "monitoring", I propose that the sentence be
restated as "The TRANSFER-DATA is refined as required in 3.9.2.4.2 to
carry
the cyclically-reported parameters (names and values)."

Best regards,
John

John Pietras
GST, Inc.
7855 Walker Drive, Suite 200
Greenbelt, MD 20770
240-542-1155



More information about the Css-csts mailing list