[Css-csts] RE: "monitoring parameters" in Cyclic Report procedure
John Pietras
john.pietras at gst.com
Tue May 5 07:58:23 EDT 2009
Yves,
Your replacement sentence is better. Thanks.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Yves.Doat at esa.int [mailto:Yves.Doat at esa.int]
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 4:15 AM
To: John Pietras
Cc: css-csts at mailman.ccsds.org; Fred Brosi; John Pietras
Subject: Re: "monitoring parameters" in Cyclic Report procedure
John,
I also noticed the issue and rephrased as follows:
"The TRANSFER-DATA shall be refined as required in 3.9.2.4.2 to carry
the
selected parameters (names, type, value and qualifier) using the
Qualified-Parameter parameter (see annex B)."
Is that Ok for you?
Regards
Yves
"John Pietras"
<john.pietras at gst.
com>
To
<Yves.Doat at esa.int>
04/05/2009 21:02
cc
<css-csts at mailman.ccsds.org>,
<Fred.Brosi at gst.com>, "John
Pietras"
<john.pietras at gst.com>
Subject
"monitoring parameters" in
Cyclic
Report procedure
Yves,
I just noticed something that had slipped by me before - in CSTS
Framework
R-0.18, the description of the Transfer-Data operation for the Cyclic
Report
procedure (section 4.7.3.2) contain the new (as or R-0.18) sentence "The
TRANSFER-DATA is refined as required in 3.9.2.4.2 to carry the
monitoring
parameters (names and values)." Since the Cyclic Report procedure is
supposed to be broader than "monitoring", I propose that the sentence be
restated as "The TRANSFER-DATA is refined as required in 3.9.2.4.2 to
carry
the cyclically-reported parameters (names and values)."
Best regards,
John
John Pietras
GST, Inc.
7855 Walker Drive, Suite 200
Greenbelt, MD 20770
240-542-1155
More information about the Css-csts
mailing list