[CMC] [Ccsds-omg-liaison] Vocabularies, Glossaries, or Ontologies for the Spacecraft Ground Systems Domain RFI available
Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
Nestor.Peccia at esa.int
Fri Feb 17 13:45:55 UTC 2017
Dear CMC members
Please find below for your awareness the different exchange of info
between CCSDS and OMG on the new OMG RFI "Vocabularies, Glossaries, or
Ontologies for the Spacecraft Ground Systems Domain RFI available"
OMG RFI
Mail of the CCSDS liaison (M. Merri, MOIMS AD) to OMG liaison to CCSDS
(Jon Siegel)
Response from OMG to CCSDS
There were, afterwards, several mails between the CESG members (from which
you saw some in my previous mail). As a consequence I, as CESG Chair, have
included the discussion in our next CESG webex. (March 2017)
Why ? Because submitting a RFI to OMG has pro and cons, and this has to be
reflected before reaching consensus. The XTCE experience showed many
advantages and many disadvantages to have an OMG standard rubberstamped by
CCSDS,
I am a true believer that the submission of such RFI to OMG deserves
approval polls at CESG and CMC level.
ciao
nestor
==================================
From: "Jon Siegel" <siegel at omg.org>
To: Mario.Merri at esa.int
Cc: Nestor.Peccia at esa.int, peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov
Date: 19/01/2017 22:54
Subject: Re: [Ccsds-omg-liaison] Vocabularies, Glossaries, or
Ontologies for the Spacecraft Ground Systems Domain RFI available
Hi Mario and everyone --
Of course I remember you, and all of the others who hosted me so
graciously some years back when we established our liaison relationship!
I'm pleased to hear that CCSDS is interested in our Space DTF work on
Vocabularies, Glossaries, or Ontologies for Spacecraft Ground Systems. Of
course I agree that your input and participation would be extremely
valuable - essential, even. However, I would not rule out your
contributing as an RFI response because that is such an effective way of
placing your intentions and details into the Space DTF queue. Do not
assume that all entries in the queue are considered equally; your status
as a Liaison partner would carry through as well.
However, I would like to take one more step before making a final
recommendation to you, and that is to consult with the Space DTF chairs -
Brad Kizzort and (recently elected) Luis Rodriguez. I will start by
sending them a private note but plan to open up our conversation by
putting you and them in direct contact in the next round.
Thank you so much for contacting OMG. I'm looking forward to carrying this
work to its next stage.
Best regards to you all --
Jon Siegel
Dr. Jon Siegel
Vice President, Technology Transfer and Director, Certification
Object Management Group
109 Highland Ave.
Needham, MA 02494 USA
==================================
From: Mario Merri/esoc/ESA
To: Jon Siegel <siegel at omg.org>
Cc: Nestor Peccia/esoc/ESA at ESA, peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov
Date: 11/01/2017 18:27
Subject: [Ccsds-omg-liaison] Vocabularies, Glossaries, or
Ontologies for the Spacecraft Ground Systems Domain RFI available
Dear Jon,
Happy new year!
You may know/remember that you and I are the liaisons between OMG and
CCSDS, respectively. Indeed we did not have many interactions lately, but
the RFI below requires some attention from us.
In fact, the CCSDS has already done significant work on the glossary as
you can verify at the CCSDS Space Assigned Number Authority(SANA) Registry
under http://sanaregistry.org/r/glossary/glossary.html. Please note that
most of these definitions are from published international standards and
that many are from ISO standards.
Admittedly, our glossary requires some work to make it truly well formed
and consistent, but it does include most of the terms that CCSDS has
defined and used since years. Because of this we think that it provides a
solid baseline that could potentially be considered as the baseline also
by the OMG SDTF. We are clearly ready to add to the CCSDS glossary
additional missing terms from the OMG SDTF, provided that they are
consistent with the rest of the glossary and the CCSDS books.
Since our organisations have established a liaison relationship, I would
not think that a CCSDS response to the RFI is the proper way forward. I
would appreciate to hear your opinion on the above and how do you suggest
to proceed.
Best regards,
Mario
==================================
From: "Juergen Boldt" <juergen at omg.org>
To: "Recipient list suppressed" :;
Date: 15/12/2016 17:41
Subject: [Ccsds-omg-liaison] Vocabularies, Glossaries, or
Ontologies for the Spacecraft Ground Systems Domain RFI available
Sent by: "CCSDS-OMG-Liaison"
<ccsds-omg-liaison-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>
All,
the Vocabularies, Glossaries, or Ontologies for the Spacecraft Ground
Systems Domain RFI issued at the recent Coronado TC meeting is now
available with the document number space/2016-12-01 at
http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?space/2016-12-01
The RFI's work in progress page is located at
http://www.omg.org/schedule/Vocabularies,_Glossaries,_or_Ontologies_for_the_Spacecraft_Ground_Systems_RFI.html
RFI responses are due February 27, 2017
Best reegards,
Juergen
The Object Management Group's Space Domain Task Force (OMG SDTF) is
seeking to normalize the terminology used within the spacecraft ground
systems domain. We are seeking information on existing or emerging
dictionaries, glossaries, or ontologies in this domain. Additionally, the
SDTF is interested in hearing from organizations that might be interested
in this topic. The SDTF will use these responses to either adopt an
existing reference or recommend the development of a new consolidated
reference
Schedule
Event
Date
Notes
RFI Issued
December 9, 2016
Relevant documents:
space/16-12-01 (Vocabularies, Glossaries, or Ontologies for the Spacecraft
Ground Systems Domain RFI)
RFI Response Deadline
February 27, 2017
RFI Response List:
Companies
Date
Notes
Termologic
February 16, 2017
Relevant documents:
space/17-02-03 (Termologic response to the Vocab., Glossaries, or
Ontologies RFI)
space/17-02-02 (Termologic response to the Vocab., Glossaries, or
Ontologies RFI - Cover letter)
Copyright © 1997-2016 Object Management Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
For questions about the WEBSITE , please contact webmaster at omg.org.
For TECHNICAL questions, please contact webtech at omg.org. This site is best
viewed with Netscape Navigator, Mozilla Firefox or Internet
Explorer versions 6.0 or later or any browser capable of viewing
JavaScript and CSS 2.0. The site is using DHTML JavaScript Menu By
Milonic.com.
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20170217/c5aca19b/attachment.html>
More information about the CMC
mailing list