[CMC] CMC Poll: CMC-P-2015-05-003 Creation the MOIMS Mission Planning and Scheduling WG

Mario.Merri at esa.int Mario.Merri at esa.int
Sun Jul 5 14:11:22 UTC 2015


Dear Nick,

I did provide the resolutions of all raised conditions to Brian on 15Jun. I
will provide evidence of this in my next email.

Regards,

__Mario



From:       Nestor Peccia/esoc/ESA
To:         "Nick Tongson" <NickT at aiaa.org>,
Cc:         "CCSDS Management Council (CMC at mailman.ccsds.org)
            (CMC at mailman.ccsds.org)" <CMC at mailman.ccsds.org>,
            "'cesg-exec at mailman.ccsds.org' (cesg-exec at mailman.ccsds.org)"
            <cesg-exec at mailman.ccsds.org>, Mario Merri/esoc/ESA at esa, "Behal
            Brigitte" <Brigitte.Behal at cnes.fr>, Mehran
            Sarkarati/esoc/ESA at esa, "Thompson Roger"
            <Roger.Thompson at scisys.co.uk>
Date:       03/07/2015 22:33
Subject:    Re: [CMC] CMC Poll: CMC-P-2015-05-003 Creation the MOIMS Mission
            Planning and Scheduling WG



Nick
The conditions have been solved
MOIMS AD/DAD
Will compile the conditions and distribute them

Ciao
Nestor


Sent from my iPhone

On 03.07.2015, at 21:47, Nick Tongson <NickT at aiaa.org> wrote:

      Dear CMC Members:

      After reviewing the recently closed CMC polls, the Secretariat noted
      that one of the CMC polls was issued prematurely and is null and void:
      CMC-P-2015-05-003 Creation the MOIMS Mission Planning and Scheduling WG
      . Conditions for the CESG poll (CESG-P-2015-04-001 Creation the MOIMS
      Mission Planning and Scheduling WG) need to be resolved appropriately
      based on the CCSDS procedures before a CMC poll is initiated (result of
      CESG poll excerpted below for reference). We apologize that the
      Secretariat did not catch this earlier.

      The specific procedures that must be followed are:


      5.3.5.4.3           Conditional Approval
      In the case of conditional approval,
      a)      the party responsible for the subject of the poll, e.g., a WG
      chair or someone delegated by the WG chair (e.g., a technical editor),
      shall act as rapporteur to address the conditions;
      b)      within 60 days of poll closure, the rapporteur shall report
      dispositions of all approval conditions to the Secretariat and, in the
      case of a document approval poll, deliver an updated version of the
      document reflecting disposition of the approval conditions;
      c)       upon receipt of the rapporteur’s report, the Secretariat shall
      communicate the disposition of the approval conditions to the voting
      body;
      d)      within 30 days of receipt of the dispositions, the individual
      (s) who voted for conditional approval shall, via e-mail to the
      Secretariat, indicate acceptance, acceptance with modification, or
      rejection of the dispositions;
      e)      if no response is received within 30 days of the Secretariat’s
      distribution of dispositions, acceptance shall be assumed;
      f)       the Secretariat shall report the result to the voting body;
      g)      if the dispositions are accepted, the Secretariat shall
      undertake the action implied by the objective of the poll;
      h)      if the dispositions are accepted with modification, the
      Secretariat shall assure that modified dispositions are implemented and
      undertake the action implied by the objective of the poll;
      i)        if the dispositions are rejected in whole or in part, the
      poll shall be deemed to have resulted in disapproval.

      Therefore, in accordance with the CCSDS procedures, the following steps
      must be completed before a new CMC poll on this subject is re-issued:

      -          a report of the disposition of the conditions (to the
      Secretariat)
      -          the individual who voted for conditional approval shall have
      30 days to indicate acceptance, acceptance with modification, or
      rejection of the dispositions

      A new CMC poll can then be initiated if the individual who voted for
      conditional approval agrees with the way forward or lets 30 days pass
      without responding.


      CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2015-04-001 Creation the MOIMS Mission
      Planning and Scheduling WG

      Results of CESG poll beginning 09 April 2015 and ending 23 April 2015:

      Abstain:  0 (0%)
      Approve Unconditionally:  7 (87.5%) (Barkley, Merri, Behal, de Cola,
      Calzolari, Suess, Barton)
      Approve with Conditions:  1 (12.5%) (Shames)
      Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%)

      CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:
      Barkley - A comment: the goals section of the charter ends mid-sentence
      as presented for the poll.  My assumption is that the goals, to be
      consistent with the stated scoping of "...The submission of Planning
      Requests (input to Mission Planning) • The distribution of
      Plans/Schedules (output of Mission Planning)..." will include blue
      books specifications for these two items.

      Shames - I have two concerns about this WG, as stated in the charter
      and white paper:
      1) The focus in most of these materials seems to be on SM&C and how it
      can solve the problem, rather than on Mission Planning and a clear
      presentation of what they need.  This is both "cart before the horse"
      and looks like an overly tight binding that may be detrimental to the
      overall usability of the resulting standards.
      2) The WG leadership is exclusively Euro-centric.  Since there does
      appear to be a significant North American interest in this it would be
      sensible to broaden the coverage to recognize that.

      Total Respondents: 8

      No response was received from the following Area(s):

      SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions
      PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:  Once Conditions are met start CMC Poll

      Regards,

      Nick

      Nick Tongson
      For the Secretariat of the Consultative Committee for Space Data
      Systems (CCSDS)
      American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics  www.aiaa.org
      1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Suite 500, Reston, VA 20191-4344
      nickt at aiaa.org 703.264.7515 (direct)

      (Embedded image moved to file: pic18634.jpg)
      cid:image002.jpg at 01CF69E6.B29CAA80

      AIAA-socialMediaIcons-2015-facebookAIAA-socialMediaIcons-2015-twitter
      AIAA-socialMediaIcons-2015-linkedin AIAA-socialMediaIcons-2015-youtube
      AIAA-socialMediaIcons-2015-flickr AIAA-socialMediaIcons-2015-instagram

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pic18634.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5543 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20150705/26ee8fa7/attachment.jpg>


More information about the CMC mailing list