[CMC] CMC Poll: CMC-P-2015-05-003 Creation the MOIMS Mission Planning and Scheduling WG

[Nestor.Peccia at esa.int]

Nick
The conditions have been solved
MOIMS AD/DAD
Will compile the conditions and distribute them

Ciao
Nestor


Sent from my iPhone

> On 03.07.2015, at 21:47, Nick Tongson <NickT at aiaa.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear CMC Members:
>  
> After reviewing the recently closed CMC polls, the Secretariat noted that one of the CMC polls was issued prematurely and is null and void: CMC-P-2015-05-003 Creation the MOIMS Mission Planning and Scheduling WG. Conditions for the CESG poll (CESG-P-2015-04-001 Creation the MOIMS Mission Planning and Scheduling WG) need to be resolved appropriately based on the CCSDS procedures before a CMC poll is initiated (result of CESG poll excerpted below for reference). We apologize that the Secretariat did not catch this earlier.
>  
> The specific procedures that must be followed are:
> 
> 5.3.5.4.3           Conditional Approval
> 
> In the case of conditional approval,
> a)      the party responsible for the subject of the poll, e.g., a WG chair or someone delegated by the WG chair (e.g., a technical editor), shall act as rapporteur to address the conditions;
> b)      within 60 days of poll closure, the rapporteur shall report dispositions of all approval conditions to the Secretariat and, in the case of a document approval poll, deliver an updated version of the document reflecting disposition of the approval conditions;
> c)       upon receipt of the rapporteur’s report, the Secretariat shall communicate the disposition of the approval conditions to the voting body;
> d)      within 30 days of receipt of the dispositions, the individual(s) who voted for conditional approval shall, via e-mail to the Secretariat, indicate acceptance, acceptance with modification, or rejection of the dispositions;
> e)      if no response is received within 30 days of the Secretariat’s distribution of dispositions, acceptance shall be assumed;
> f)       the Secretariat shall report the result to the voting body;
> g)      if the dispositions are accepted, the Secretariat shall undertake the action implied by the objective of the poll;
> h)      if the dispositions are accepted with modification, the Secretariat shall assure that modified dispositions are implemented and undertake the action implied by the objective of the poll;
> i)        if the dispositions are rejected in whole or in part, the poll shall be deemed to have resulted in disapproval.
>  
> Therefore, in accordance with the CCSDS procedures, the following steps must be completed before a new CMC poll on this subject is re-issued:
>  
> -          a report of the disposition of the conditions (to the Secretariat)
> -          the individual who voted for conditional approval shall have 30 days to indicate acceptance, acceptance with modification, or rejection of the dispositions
>  
> A new CMC poll can then be initiated if the individual who voted for conditional approval agrees with the way forward or lets 30 days pass without responding.
>  
>  
> CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2015-04-001 Creation the MOIMS Mission Planning and Scheduling WG 
> 
> Results of CESG poll beginning 09 April 2015 and ending 23 April 2015: 
> 
> Abstain:  0 (0%) 
> Approve Unconditionally:  7 (87.5%) (Barkley, Merri, Behal, de Cola, Calzolari, Suess, Barton) 
> Approve with Conditions:  1 (12.5%) (Shames) 
> Disapprove with Comment:  0 (0%) 
> 
> CONDITIONS/COMMENTS: 
> Barkley - A comment: the goals section of the charter ends mid-sentence as presented for the poll.  My assumption is that the goals, to be consistent with the stated scoping of "...The submission of Planning Requests (input to Mission Planning) • The distribution of Plans/Schedules (output of Mission Planning)..." will include blue books specifications for these two items. 
> 
> Shames - I have two concerns about this WG, as stated in the charter and white paper: 
> 1) The focus in most of these materials seems to be on SM&C and how it can solve the problem, rather than on Mission Planning and a clear presentation of what they need.  This is both "cart before the horse" and looks like an overly tight binding that may be detrimental to the overall usability of the resulting standards. 
> 2) The WG leadership is exclusively Euro-centric.  Since there does appear to be a significant North American interest in this it would be sensible to broaden the coverage to recognize that. 
> 
> Total Respondents: 8 
> 
> No response was received from the following Area(s): 
> 
> SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:  Approved with Conditions 
> PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION:  Once Conditions are met start CMC Poll
> 
> Regards,
>  
> Nick
>  
> Nick Tongson
> For the Secretariat of the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS)
> American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics  www.aiaa.org 
> 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Suite 500, Reston, VA 20191-4344
> nickt at aiaa.org 703.264.7515 (direct)
>  
> 
>  
>     
>  

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20150703/c8621d9e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5543 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20150703/c8621d9e/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2203 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20150703/c8621d9e/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2282 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20150703/c8621d9e/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2249 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20150703/c8621d9e/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2442 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20150703/c8621d9e/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2249 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20150703/c8621d9e/attachment-0004.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2323 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc/attachments/20150703/c8621d9e/attachment-0005.png>