[CESG] FW: [EXTERNAL] [SSG] Third set of proposed PID dispositions from CESG review of CCSDS 313.2-Y-1.1

[Shames, Peter M (US 312B)]

Dear CESG,

Attached please find the third set of PID dispositions that resulted from the CESG review of CCSDS 313.2-Y-1.1, the revised Procedures for SANA Registry Specification document.  These have been reviewed by members of the SSG and no substantive issues were identified.  They were also sent to the specific CESG members who raised PIDs and no replies have been received.

Unless there are objections raised at this point I think we can consider these resolutions for the PIDs acceptable and therefore request the CTE to process these changes to this document.   I ask you all to please confirm that these resolutions are, in fact, acceptable.

There is also a last yellow book on the URN policy that will receive similar treatment.

Best regards, Peter


From: SSG <ssg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> on behalf of "SANA Steering Group (SSG)" <ssg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Reply-To: Peter Shames <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 8:14 AM
To: "SANA Steering Group (SSG)" <ssg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [SSG] Third set of proposed PID dispositions from CESG review of CCSDS 313.2-Y-1.1

Dear SSG colleagues,

I have prepared a set of initial PID dispositions that resulted from the CESG review of CCSDS 313.2-Y-1.1, the revised Procedures for SANA Registry Specification document.  This is the last revised yellow book in this series to process.

There are two sets of files:
1.      A set that consists of the text inputs from several CESG members along with my proposed resolutions
2.      A set that contains only inputs from Gippo (GPC), using from/to language, along with my proposed resolutions
3.      The draft doc that was reviewed is also attached for reference

Please review these and provide feedback no later than CoB Friday, 13 March.  I know that this is not much time, but I am trying to get all three docs turned around before the working meetings.

Thanks for your support, Peter

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20200319/04dba4bc/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CESG-P-2020-02-003 email-pdf-SSG responses.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 21252 bytes
Desc: CESG-P-2020-02-003 email-pdf-SSG responses.docx
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20200319/04dba4bc/attachment-0002.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CESG-P-2020-02-003_PIDs_313x2y11.SLSv1.0-SSG responses.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 31961 bytes
Desc: CESG-P-2020-02-003_PIDs_313x2y11.SLSv1.0-SSG responses.docx
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20200319/04dba4bc/attachment-0003.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 313x2y11_CESG_Approval.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 115504 bytes
Desc: 313x2y11_CESG_Approval.pdf
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20200319/04dba4bc/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ATT00001.txt
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20200319/04dba4bc/attachment-0001.txt>