[CESG] SEA SAWG proposed edits to the SOIS document, CCSDS 870.10-Y-1, MO Services and SOIS Electronic Data Sheets
Sam Cooper
sam at brightascension.com
Mon Feb 25 09:11:14 UTC 2019
Hi Peter,
Yes, sorry, attached (hopefully).
Cheers,
Sam.
On 21/02/2019 17:16, Shames, Peter M (312B) wrote:
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> This came today, but there was no attachment …
>
> Thanks, Peter
>
> *From: *Sam Cooper <sam at brightascension.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, February 21, 2019 at 12:53 AM
> *To: *Peter Shames <Peter.M.Shames at jpl.nasa.gov>, Mario Merri
> <Mario.Merri at esa.int>, "Mehran.Sarkarati at esa.int"
> <Mehran.Sarkarati at esa.int>, Roger Thompson
> <roger.s.thompson at btinternet.com>, Dan Smith
> <danford.s.smith at nasa.gov>, "Wilmot, Jonathan J. (GSFC-5820)"
> <Jonathan.J.Wilmot at NASA.gov>, "Rakow, Glenn P. (GSFC-5610)"
> <glenn.p.rakow at nasa.gov>, Richard Melvin <Richard.Melvin at scisys.co.uk>
> *Cc: *SEA-SA <sea-sa at mailman.ccsds.org>, CCSDS Engineering Steering
> Group - CESG Exec <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>
> *Subject: *Re: SEA SAWG proposed edits to the SOIS document, CCSDS
> 870.10-Y-1, MO Services and SOIS Electronic Data Sheets
>
> Sending again...
>
>
> On 13/02/2019 09:37, Sam Cooper wrote:
>
> HI Peter,
>
> Thank you fro taking the time to lead this activity, I've reviewed
> the red marked version of the document (I hope that was the
> correct one to review).
>
> I've attached my commented and change tracked version for you, it
> seems like a real step forward and only gets a little confused in
> section 5 (easily rectified I think) and a little "personal" in
> section 6.
>
> Best regards,
> Sam.
>
> On 09/02/2019 01:04, Shames, Peter M (312B) wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> As reported during the CESG Telecon on 7 Feb 2019, the Systems
> Engineering Area (SEA), using resources of the Systems
> Architecture Working Group (SAWG), has completed a review of
> the SOIS document, CCSDS 870.10-Y-1, MO Services and SOIS
> Electronic Data Sheets and proposed a set of updates to
> resolve differences of opinion between SOIS and MOIMS and
> clarify the relationships. This result was derived using
> meeting and email discussions within the SAWG and particularly
> with representatives of the two different points of view
> (Roger Thompson and Ramon Krosley) and the original author of
> the document (Richard Melvin). Before sending this document
> out more widely these parties were polled and they concurred
> in this release, with two minor issues noted. Those issues
> have been dealt with in this version.
>
> Three files are attached:
>
> 1)A "clean" version with changes accepted, but revised text
> left in red
>
> 2)A raw version with all of the tracked changes visible
>
> 3)A spreadsheet extracted from the marked up PDF files, along
> with the audit trail of discussions leading to resolution
>
> Since this is, in effect, a cross-area "working group" of
> sorts I would like to ask all of those who have a stake in
> this to review the document and provide feedback in two weeks,
> by 22 Feb 2019. I'd like to use a consensus process over
> email and am hoping we can wrap this up quickly. We will
> still need to process the final result through the CESG for
> approval to publish.
>
> Thanks, Peter
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20190225/c4753262/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 870x10y0_CESG_Approval-SEA (Revised 8Feb19) - SC comments.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 1878711 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20190225/c4753262/attachment-0001.docx>
More information about the CESG
mailing list