[SSG] [CESG] ?Band Bins? for SCID assignments

Shames, Peter M (312B) peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov
Tue Aug 4 19:27:09 UTC 2015


Hi Keith,

I agree that we need some tie to specific frequencies.  In the frequency band table that I adopted from the IEEE the bands are separated along exact fraequencies, such as  8 Ghz – 12 GHZ.   This table was in the spredsheet I sent out, but I did not repeat it in the email itself.   It appears that there are separate, and somewhat different, identifiers in use in the EU, NATO, ECM, ITU, and EIA / IEC waveguide communities.  I propose that we adopt one, the IEEE, and stick to it.  This is not to suggest that there aren’t other, far more precise and carefully identified frequency bands that the SFCG and ITU care about, but those more crisp distinctions do not really help us in this situation.

That said, this still leaves us with potentially a large number of “bands”, much more than is useful for our purposes.  And that is why I proposed that we create these “Band Bins”.  I’ve augmented those proposed Band Bins, below, with the frequencies that they include.

Purely based on pragmatic considerations I would suggest that we could create “Band Bins” that looked like this:
·Everything below S-Band (HF, VHF, UHF, L)   0-2 GHz
·S-Band & C-Band   2-8 GHz
·X-Band   8-12 GHz
·K-Band (Ku, K, Ka) 12-40 GHz
·None or unstated

This is, of course, just a proposal, but it is based on A) the IEEE frequency Bands and their associated frequency ranges, and B) a pragmatic binning of these that provides separate “bins” for S/C operating at sufficiently different frequencies.

Regards, Peter


From: Keith Scott <kscott at mitre.org<mailto:kscott at mitre.org>>
Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 11:46 AM
To: Peter Shames <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>>, Gian Paolo Calzolari <Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>>, CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Cc: "SANA Steering Group (SSG)" <ssg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:ssg at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Subject: RE: [SSG] [CESG] ?Band Bins? for SCID assignments

I would suggest that there be SOME mapping of the band bin edges to specific (numerical) frequencies, whether it’s direct or whether CCSDS defines or references a specific standard of set of standards for where that bins are.

Alternately, and FAR more complicated, a SCID could be associated with some filter (energy outside that filter < XXXdbM).  That’s probably much more trouble than it’s worth, and the bins seem better to me.

                                --keith

From: cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> [mailto:cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Shames, Peter M (312B)
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 11:50 AM
To: Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>; CCSDS CESG -- <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Cc: SANA Steering Group (SSG) <ssg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:ssg at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Subject: Re: [SSG] [CESG] ?Band Bins? for SCID assignments

Here is the screen shot attachment of the IOAG RF Assets registry, http://sanaregistry.org/r/rf_assets/rf_assets.html.

Peter


From: <ssg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:ssg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>> on behalf of Gian Paolo Calzolari <Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>>
Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM
To: CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Cc: "SANA Steering Group (SSG)" <ssg at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:ssg at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Subject: [SSG] [CESG] ?Band Bins? for SCID assignments

Peter,
        with respect to your proposal below, if imit will be implemented I do recommend keeping consistency with the headers of the IOAG RF assets table (to be modified I think) where the frequency bands are explicity addressed with numbers.

Purely based on pragmatic considerations I would suggest that we could create “Band Bins” that looked like this:
·Everything below S-Band (HF, VHF, UHF, L)
·S-Band & C-Band
·X-Band
·K-Band (Ku, K, Ka)
·None or unstated

Regards

Gian Paolo
·

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.

The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its

content is not permitted.

If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.

Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.



Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cesg/attachments/20150804/01a7a993/attachment.html>


More information about the CESG mailing list