[cssm] 902x11-BPR - Best Practises Service Management Level-0 Initial Draft Uploaded to CWE
Martin Unal
Martin.Unal at esa.int
Fri Jan 10 14:11:39 UTC 2025
Hello
I have added few comments in the document.
I join a summary table I have created to track the field amongs various product.
* The definition of Version is problematic. The implementation cost to populate the field has defined is used. For no benefit.
The description shall be changed to be a recommandation only
* SMURF update/delete
Reference to the mission agreement can cause inconsitency between request.
* Service type and parameter.
I expect lots of discrepancy between implementations here. Two fields can convey information on that regards
* serviceAgreementRef Used by ESTRACK to define service type (e.g. DDOR, TTC)
* <onlineSrvPkgType1Details configurationProfileRef Used by ESTRACK to define service parameter (e.g. TM_RATE)
Shall we include a recommandation on how to cover that topic ? But we would have to agree on one.
Or we highlight the fact this aspect is out of the “simple SMURF” and shall be covered by bilateral agreement.
Happy new year to all. 😊
Regards
________________________________________
Martin UNAL
Ground Operation Engineer
Ground Facilities Ops HSO - ONO
H-376
ESOC
Robert-Bosch Strasse 5
64 293 Darmstadt
Germany
Tel +49 6151 90 2959
________________________________________
From: SMWG <smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> On Behalf Of Colin Haddow via SMWG
Sent: 20 December 2024 19:10
To: CCSDS Service Management W/G <smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: [cssm] 902x11-BPR - Best Practises Service Management Level-0 Initial Draft Uploaded to CWE
Dear all,
as a special Christmas present for the W/G (especially Martin) I've just uploaded the initial draft of the Best Practises Service Management Level-0 Initial to CWE, this will give you something to do over the long boring Christmas holidays (🙂 🙂 🙂). This is a zip file containing the Word document and XML examples along with the required schemas to validate the examples. This can be found at the following URL;
* 902x11-BPR W/G Pack: https://cwe.ccsds.org/css/docs/CSS-SM/CWE%20Private/Book%20Production/Magenta/Best%20Practices/White%20Book/Drafts/902x11w01-BPR-20241220-CRH_WG_Pack.zip
In addition I've created a GitHub release with the UML models and XML examples and schemas. This can be found at the following URL;
* 902x11-BPR GitHub release: https://github.com/CCSDS-CSSM/902Repository/releases/tag/WG_Release-20241220
I'd appreciate any feedback, especially from Martin and Phil as they're already effectively using the precursor to SM Level-0 operationally.
Merry Christmas 🎅🎄❄️🎁& A Happy New Year 🎆🎇🍾to One & All
Colin
Dr. Colin R. Haddow
Scotty Consulting UG
This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20250110/9e70f7d2/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 902x11w01-BPR-20241220-CRH-MU.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 375936 bytes
Desc: 902x11w01-BPR-20241220-CRH-MU.docx
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20250110/9e70f7d2/attachment-0001.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Review notes.xlsx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
Size: 12600 bytes
Desc: Review notes.xlsx
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20250110/9e70f7d2/attachment-0001.xlsx>
More information about the SMWG
mailing list