[cssm] [EXTERNAL] Updates:- Service Management Common data Entities Book, SMURF Book, UML Model, XML Schema.

[Eddy, Wesley M. (GSFC-580.0)[MTI SYSTEMS, INC.]]

On the point below about srvPkgReqVersion, I think we would additionally remove the corresponding serviceReqVersion attribute from the ServicePkgBody in the SPDF.

From: SMWG <smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org> On Behalf Of Colin.Haddow at esa.int
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 5:55 AM
To: CCSDS Service Mgmt WG <smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Cc: Wolfgang.Frase at dlr.de
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [cssm] Updates:- Service Management Common data Entities Book, SMURF Book, UML Model, XML Schema.

...

One point for discussion at the next telecon. At the last telecon (13/07/2021) we agreed to make the srvPkgReqVersion parameter of the ServicePkgReq class in the SMURF optional. On going through Marcins notes from the SMURF prototyping test report I found that Marcin, Anthony and I had discussed deleting this parameter completely. I think that this is actually a better solution and recommend, unless someone has got a really good reason for keeping it, that we delete the srvPkgReqVersion parameter.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20210722/9c0a7297/attachment.htm>