[Smwg] CCSDS RID Form - Beta testing requested.
Colin.Haddow at esa.int
Colin.Haddow at esa.int
Tue Jun 11 15:27:48 UTC 2019
Hi John,
yes I've noticed that can occur in Reader. If the "Fields
highlight color" in the Forms section of Preferences in Reader is set to
something other than white or gray the effect is to change the apparent
colour of the field until you actually enter the field. There doesn't seem
to be a way (or at least I haven't managed to find it) that allows you to
set the highlight colour in the Form Definition. Maybe need to add a note
in the Form Instructions.
Anyway thanks to everyone for the testing and feedback, With the exception
of the minor glitch noted by John above there have been no issues reported
(even on a Mac !).
Cheers for now,
Colin
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Colin R. Haddow,
HSO-GI, European Space Agency,
European Space Operations Centre,
Robert-Bosch-Str 5,
64293 Darmstadt,
Germany.
Phone; +49 6151 90 2896
Fax; +49 6151 90 3010
E-Mail; colin.haddow at esa.int
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: John Pietras <john.pietras at gst.com>
To: "Colin.Haddow at esa.int" <Colin.Haddow at esa.int>,
"erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov" <erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov>,
"Holger.Dreihahn at esa.int" <Holger.Dreihahn at esa.int>, "Eddy, Wesley M.
(GRC-LCN0)[MTI SYSTEMS, INC.] via SMWG" <smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>,
"Marcin.Gnat at dlr.de" <Marcin.Gnat at dlr.de>, "Hugh Kelliher
(hugh.kelliher at spaceconnexions.com)" <hugh.kelliher at spaceconnexions.com>,
Anthony Crowson <anthony.crowson at telespazio-vega.de>
Date: 11/06/2019 17:02
Subject: RE: CCSDS RID Form - Beta testing requested.
Colin,
I?m using Adobe Acrobat Pro/Windows 7. At least on my screen, when I look
at the form the colors don?t conform to your color code. However, they *do
* conform once the cursor has been placed in a field. The fields that are
supposed to be pink and light blue are mauve, and the fields that are
supposed to be green are light blue:
Having experimented with this and knowing what the right answer is, I can
personally correct for this. But it might be confusing to others. Perhaps
you could also preface the names of the mandatory field with ?*? (e.g.,
*SUBMITTING ORGANIZATION), optional with ?-? (-SUPPORTING ANALYSIS), and
prohibited with some other character (e.g., #DISPOSITION) and add those
?definitions? to the instructions.
Best regards,
John
From: Colin.Haddow at esa.int [mailto:Colin.Haddow at esa.int]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2019 10:53 AM
To: erik.j.barkley at jpl.nasa.gov; Holger.Dreihahn at esa.int; Eddy, Wesley M.
(GRC-LCN0)[MTI SYSTEMS, INC.] via SMWG <smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>;
Marcin.Gnat at dlr.de; Hugh Kelliher (hugh.kelliher at spaceconnexions.com)
<hugh.kelliher at spaceconnexions.com>; Anthony Crowson
<anthony.crowson at telespazio-vega.de>; John Pietras <john.pietras at gst.com>
Subject: CCSDS RID Form - Beta testing requested.
Dear all,
attached is a revised version of the prototype RID form.
This should work with recent versions of Acrobat Reader. Hopefully the
instructions in the form will be self explanatory. I'd be grateful if you
could spent a few minutes "playing" with the form and let me know if you
find any issues or have any comments.
You will notice that when you delete a RID, it is replaced by a page
stating "RID Deleted"., this is because when you insert a form page the
fields on it are named based on the page number, however if you delete a
page the existing fields on the pages after the deleted page are not
renamed. The document however now contains 1 page less and so if you then
insert a new RID you end up with duplicate filed names which has
interesting consequences. As far as I can tell (bearing in mind I am by no
means an Adobe/Java Script whizzkid) there is no straightforward way to
work round this, hence the approach of just entering a page stating "RID
Deleted.". This keeps the page count the same so there are no duplicate
field names.
The issue with merging files of RIDs into one using Adobe Acrobat or
similar tools is essentially the same - it leads to duplicate field names.
Anyway any feedback gratefully received, especially for non-Windows
platforms as I've only tested on my Windows 10 laptop using Acrobat Reader
2017.
Cheers for now,
Colin
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Colin R. Haddow,
HSO-GI, European Space Agency,
European Space Operations Centre,
Robert-Bosch-Str 5,
64293 Darmstadt,
Germany.
Phone; +49 6151 90 2896
Fax; +49 6151 90 3010
E-Mail; colin.haddow at esa.int
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may
contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or
dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies
appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA
Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).
This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20190611/4863413d/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 35073 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20190611/4863413d/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the SMWG
mailing list