[Smwg] Inputs for PIF

[Barkley, Erik J (3970)]

CSSM Colleagues,

Per today's CSSM telecon, the WG is requested to review the comments/question prior to the telecon scheduled for 19 September.  Your inputs prior to 19 September will be much appreciated.

Best regards,
-Erik

From: SMWG [mailto:smwg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Barkley, Erik J (3970)
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 4:16 PM
To: CCSDS Service Mgmt WG <smwg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: [Smwg] Inputs for PIF

CSSM Colleagues,

Some comments and questions are in the attached spreadsheet. These come from thinking about the prototyping and producing a CCSDS PIF based on current planning information that is generated within the DSN.

Not in the spreadsheet but somewhat implied is the ability to add some annotation data to the event (for example of regard to the comment on the elevation ascending to indicate perhaps the semantics of clearing the particular elevation degree).  Also, the current PIF UML diagram has the notion of extension just being a parameter/value pair. Perhaps that is okay, but I think we probably should take a step back and look at the extension techniques that were developed for the SSF and see if they apply for the PIF, and to the SMURF for that matter as well.

I propose that we discussed this briefly at the teleconference tomorrow.


Best regards,
-Erik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/smwg/attachments/20170829/b03cd5a7/attachment.html>