[SLS] SANA Glossary: [CESG] CESG Resolutions for CMC approval
Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int
Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int
Fri Apr 20 08:21:27 UTC 2018
Dear All,
I would like to draw your attention on the resolution
SEA-R-2018-04-07 Approve the SANA Operator marking all
Glossary entries (both Terms and Acronyms) that have a relevant, approved,
document as “Approved” and not “Provisional”.
At this time you (as WG Chairs) are not requested to check ALL your WG's
documents to confirm that the terms in the glossary can pass to approved
status, however for new documents (and possibly updates) it is requested
that the terms in the document are checked against the CCSDS Glossary to
avoid proliferation of several different (and possibly conflicting)
definitions for the same term.
In other words, if a term in a document you are preparing is already
present in SANA because it is defined in another approved document, use
the same formulation (unless unavoidable)
The Glossary available at https://sanaregistry.org/r/glossary includes
CCSDS Terms and CCSDS Abbreviations:
https://sanaregistry.org/r/terms
https://sanaregistry.org/r/abbreviations
Thank you all and best regards
Gian Paolo
----- Forwarded by Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA on 20/04/2018 10:11 -----
From: "Shames, Peter M (312B)" <peter.m.shames at jpl.nasa.gov>
To: CCSDS Secretariat <secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org>
Cc: "SANA Steering Group \(SSG\)" <ssg at mailman.ccsds.org>, CCSDS
Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec <cesg at mailman.ccsds.org>
Date: 20/04/2018 02:03
Subject: [CESG] CESG Resolutions for CMC approval
Sent by: "CESG" <cesg-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>
Dear Secretariat,
Please process the following SEA resolutions to move them through the
CCSDS processes for review and approval.
Each of these resolutions, in draft form, has already been reviewed by the
CESG, and, after discussion, unanimously approved by show of hands, during
our meeting on Monday, 16 Apr 2018.
Thanks, Peter
====================================================
SEA-R-2018-04-04 Request that each CCSDS Agency and Observer
ensure that they have at least one authorized Agency Representative (AR)
for managing Agency information in the SANA, and that this information is
updated.
The System Engineering Area,
CONSIDERING that:
The CCSDS SANA Registry Management Policy (CCSDS 313.1-Y-1, May 2016)
defines CCSDS Organization, Contacts, Service Site and Aperture, and
related registries, and that
The RMP specifies that each Agency shall designate at least one Agency
Representative (AR) to control the agency information that is stored in
these registries, and that
The SANA Operator has created all of these registries and populated them
with initial values that were drawn from the CCSDS website records, and
that
There is evidence that information for some organizations is missing or
out of date, and that
The SEA SANA Steering group (SSG) and the CESG have reviewed and approved
this resolution, and that
The SEA AD has reviewed this resolution and agrees that it is ready to be
sent to the CMC for review and approval.
And RECOGNIZING that:
Each CCSDS Member, Observer, and Associate organizations who participate
in CCSDS are the only authoritative sources of this information, and that
The orderly management of these SANA Registries requires that there is at
least one identified AR for each agency, and that
The SANA Operator needs to know who the AR is for each agency in order to
operate these registries, and that
The CCSDS SEA Area Director, as chair of the SSG, is responsible for
requesting CMC approval of matters relating to the SANA.
RESOLVES to request:
That the Head of Delegation (HoD) of each CCSDS Member, Observer, and
Associate organization confirm their Agency Representative (AR), or assign
one if needed, who shall have responsibility for managing the entries in
these registries, and that
The AR for each CCSDS Member, Observer, and Associate organization review
the entries in the Organization, Contacts, and Service Site and Aperture
registries to ensure that those entries for their organization are present
are accurate, and that
These assignments and any needed updates are carried out within one month
following CMC concurrence with the resolution, and that
The Secretariat initiate the CMC review of this proposal for approval, and
that
The Secretariat then inform the SANA Operator of CMC concurrence with this
resolution.
====================================================
SEA-R-2018-04-05 Require that each Agency Representative (AR)
shall be asked to review the newly imported Mission / Spacecraft from the
CCSDS Website and identify overlapping, aliased, missing, and/or retired
entries.
The System Engineering Area,
CONSIDERING that:
The CCSDS SANA Registry Management Policy (CCSDS 313.1-Y-1, May 2016)
defines a CCSDS Spacecraft registries, and that
The SANA Operator has created this registry, populated it with initial
Spacecraft ID values that were drawn from the original text-based SCID
registry, and that
The SANA Operator has further updated and validated this Spacecraft
registry using the original paper forms, where available, and that
The SANA Operator has just integrated the separate list of 429 Spacecraft
that were maintained on the CCSDS website, and that
This V&V operation has revealed that at least 117 of these spacecraft were
not already present in the Spacecraft database, and that
A further (brief) review has indicated that some spacecraft that have
allocated SCIDs and are operational are not yet registered in the SANA
Spacecraft registry, and that
There is evidence that some organizations have been "self-assigning" SCIDs
for operational spacecraft, which raises a risk of significant issues, and
that
The SEA SANA Steering group (SSG) and the CESG have reviewed and approved
this policy change, and that
The SEA AD has reviewed this resolution and agrees that it is ready to be
sent to the CMC for approval.
And RECOGNIZING that:
A single, authoritative, registry of Spacecraft and their assigned CCSDS
SCIDs is essential for orderly conduct of CCSDS space link communications
and cross support, and that
The CCSDS Member, Observer, and Associate organizations who use CCSDS
standards and develop CCSDS compliant spacecraft are the only
authoritative source of this spacecraft information, and that
The RMP requires that each Agency or Associate must identify (or confirm)
the Agency Representative (AR) who has responsibility for managing the
entries in the Spacecraft registry, and that
The SANA Operator needs accurate information about Spacecraft and SCID
assignments in order to operate the SCID registry, and that
Failure to correctly assign and use SCIDs could result in significant
issues and/or loss of control of a spacecraft, and that
The CCSDS SEA Area Director, as chair of the SSG, is responsible for
requesting CMC approval of SANA Policy changes.
RESOLVES to request:
That the Head of Delegation (HoD) of each CCSDS Member, Observer, and
Associate organization confirm their Agency Representative (AR), or assign
one if needed, who is delegated responsibility for managing the agency's
entries in the Spacecraft registry, and that
The AR for each CCSDS Member, Observer, and Associate organization review
the Spacecraft registry to ensure that those entries for their
organization that are present are accurate, and that
The AR for each CCSDS Member, Observer, and Associate organization review
the Spacecraft registry and ensure that retired spacecraft are correctly
marked and the SCIDs are returned for use, and that
The Secretariat initiate the CMC review of this proposal for approval, and
that
The Secretariat then inform the SANA Operator of approval for this
operational policy change.
====================================================
SEA-R-2018-04-06 Approve controlled access to the SANA CCSDS
Service Site and Aperture Registry (SS&A) for both read only and write
operations
The System Engineering Area,
CONSIDERING that:
The CCSDS SANA Registry Management Policy (RMP, CCSDS 313.1-Y-1, May 2016)
defines a Service Site and Aperture (SS&A) registry, and that
The SANA Operator has created this Provisional registry and populated it
with initial an initial aperture list and related values drawn from the
IOAG RF Asset Registry, and that
The majority of the data values in this SS&A registry can be discovered
on-line via public websites and/or Google Maps, and that
The Cross Support Area (CSTS and SM WG), the MOIMS Area (Nav WG), and the
SEA Area (D-DOR and Sec WG) need to make reference to and update the sites
and services that are registered in the SS&A registry for their standards,
and that
The users of these standards require read access to this SS&A registry,
and that
These Working Groups, from time to time, require controlled access to
these registries to make updates, and that
The SEA SANA Steering group (SSG) and the CESG have reviewed and approved
this policy change, and that
The SEA AD has reviewed this resolution and agrees that it is ready to be
sent to the CMC for approval.
And RECOGNIZING that:
All of the SANA registries are designed, by intent, to have open public
access, and that
The SANA Operator needs clear guidance as to access policies where any
restriction on access to a registry is required, and that
The CCSDS SEA Area Director, as chair of the SSG, is responsible for
requesting CMC approval of SANA Policy changes.
RESOLVES to request:
That restricted access to the SANA Service Site and Aperture (SS&A)
registry be made available, and that
Only persons who are registered in the CCSDS Contact registry, and have
CCSDS CWE credentials, be permitted read-only access to the SS&A registry,
and that
Only persons who are appointed Agency Representatives (AR), or who are
designated Points of Contact (PoC) for authorized Working Groups, be
granted permission to request changes to the SS&A registry, and that
The Secretariat initiate the CMC review of this proposal for approval, and
that
The Secretariat then inform the SANA of approval for this operational
policy change.
====================================================
SEA-R-2018-04-07 Approve the SANA Operator marking all
Glossary entries (both Terms and Acronyms) that have a relevant, approved,
document as “Approved” and not “Provisional”.
The System Engineering Area,
CONSIDERING that:
The CCSDS SANA Registry Management Policy (RMP, CCSDS 313.1-Y-1, May 2016)
defines CCSDS Glossary registries (Terms and Acronyms), and that
The SANA Operator has created this registry, populated it with initial
Glossary (Term and Acronym) values that were initially drawn from the
approved CCSDS Documents, and that
The Glossary entries have been defined and approved in published CCSDS
documents that have undergone Agency, CESG, and CMC approval processes,
and that
The Glossary entries in this registry are now marked as "Provisional", and
that
The SEA SANA Steering group (SSG) and the CESG have reviewed and approved
this policy change, and that
The SEA AD has reviewed this resolution and agrees that it is ready to be
sent to the CMC for approval.
And RECOGNIZING that:
This Glossary, due to the terms and acronyms being formally defined in
approved standards, ought to be marked "Approved" and not "Provisional",
and that
The SANA Operator needs clear guidance as to approval status of a registry
or parts thereof, and that
The CCSDS SEA Area Director, as chair of the SSG, is responsible for
requesting CMC approval of SANA Policy changes.
RESOLVES to request:
That all the Glossary Terms and Acronyms in the SANA Glossary registry
that are in current documents be marked "Approved", and that
The Secretariat initiate the CMC review of this proposal for approval, and
that
The Secretariat then inform the SANA Operator of approval for this
operational policy change.
====================================================
SEA-R-2018-04-08 Require that the CCSDS Secretariat (website
operator) shall provide their current Organization, HoD, and PoC
information in a form that can be ingested into the SANA Organization
registry, and that the SANA registry shall be used as the authoritative
source after this initialization.
The System Engineering Area,
CONSIDERING that:
The CCSDS SANA Registry Management Policy (RMP, CCSDS 313.1-Y-1, May 2016)
defines a CCSDS Organization registry, associated contents and policies,
and a related Contact registry, and that
The SANA Operator has created this Organization registry, populated it
with initial Organization, name, address, and Head of Delegation (HoD)
values that were drawn from the previous, somewhat ad hoc, registries, and
that
The CCSCS Secretariat is the authoritative source of CCSDS Organization
and HoD information for Member Agencies, Observer Agencies, Associates,
and Liaison Organizations , and that
The CCSDS Secretariat does not manage this information in an accessible
database, it is in various web page lists and tables, and that
The SEA SANA Steering group (SSG) and the CESG have reviewed and approved
this policy change, and that
The SEA AD has reviewed this resolution and agrees that it is ready to be
sent to the CMC for approval.
And RECOGNIZING that:
This SANA Organization registry is implemented, complies with the RMP,
uses database technology, and provides a programmable interface, and that
The CMC is to remain the authorizing entity for all member agency and
other organization participation approvals, as specified in CCSDS Org and
Proc, CCSDS A02.1-Y-4, and that
The CCSDS Secretariat is to remain the source of information for member
and other organization changes, and that
The CCSDS Secretariat needs clear guidance as to how it should handle this
information, and that
The SANA Operator needs clear guidance as to updating the Organization
registry, and that
The CCSDS SEA Area Director, as chair of the SSG, is responsible for
requesting CMC approval of SANA Policy changes, and that
The CMC is responsible for requesting CCSDS Secretariat and website policy
changes..
RESOLVES to request:
That the CCSDS Secretariat provide all of the current CCSDS organization
information that it has in an agreed form suitable for ingest into the
SANA Organization registry, and that
The CCSDS Secretariat provide all of the current HoD, and other PoC
information that it has in an agreed form suitable for ingest into the
SANA Contact registry, and that
The SANA incorporate this information into their Organization and Contact
registries, resolving any ambiguities, and that
The SANA Organization and Contact registries shall be the authoritative
source of this information, with updates controlled by the CCSDS
Secretariat, and that
The CCSDS Secretariat modify their Organization and related Contact web
pages to draw this authoritative information directly from the SANA
registries, and that
The Secretariat initiate the CMC review of this proposal for approval, and
that
The Secretariat then inform the CCSDS Secretariat and the SANA Operator of
approval for this operational policy change.
====================================================
SEA-R-2018-04-09 Ask CMC for candidates to lead a new Time
Services BoF.
The System Engineering Area,
CONSIDERING that:
The IOAG, in IOAG Service Catalog 2, has identified a "Time Services
Group" that includes a Time Synchronization Service, and that references
Time Transfer and Clock Correlation functions, neither of which are
standardized at present, and that
The CCSDS Management Council has asked the SEA to initiate a Time BoF that
is intended to standardize these new services, and that
The SEA AD has previously asked the CMC for candidates for Working Group /
BoF chair, and that
The CCSDS Agencies, to date, have only provided staff who are "interested
in the topic", but no one to lead the work.
And RECOGNIZING that:
Any new WG or BoF must have dedicated, capable, leadership, and that
The absence of a nominated leader with suitable technical skills has put
any progress on this work at jeopardy, and that
Failure to identify a technically competent WG lead for this effort will
result in this request from the IOAG not being met.
RESOLVES to request:
That the CCSDS Management Council members be polled again and asked to
identify candidates qualified to lead this Time BoF and the follow on
Working Group, and that
The Secretariat initiate the CMC poll for one or more candidates, and that
The Secretariat then inform the SEA AD of the outcome of this poll.
====================================================
SEA-R-2018-04-10 Ask CMC for candidates to lead the Delta-DOR
WG.
The System Engineering Area,
CONSIDERING that:
The SEA has had a small, but effective, WG to develop Delta-DOR standards
for high resolution plane-of-the-sky position determination, and that
The previous WG Chair has had a change of position and is no longer able
to lead this work, and that
The CMC is to be polled for any suitable, knowledgeable, candidates to
lead this work.
And RECOGNIZING that:
Every WG requires dedicated leadership, and that
The absence of a capable leader has put progress on this work in jeopardy,
and that
Failure to identify a technically competent WG lead for this effort may
result in a significant slow down in this WG.
RESOLVES to request:
That the CCSDS Management Council members be polled and asked to identify
candidates qualified to lead this D-DOR Working Group, and that
The Secretariat initiate the CMC poll, and that
The Secretariat then inform the SEA AD of the outcome of this poll.
_______________________________________________
CESG mailing list
CESG at mailman.ccsds.org
https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cesg
This message is sent for information and/or discussion purposes only.
It shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a commitment for ESA.
It is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.
It may contain proprietary information and/or protected content.
Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.
ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect personal data.
In case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls/attachments/20180420/d09a6c69/attachment.html>
More information about the SLS
mailing list