[Sls-slp] Comments CESG Review of USLP RED Book

Stefan.Veit at dlr.de Stefan.Veit at dlr.de
Thu Jul 28 13:14:04 UTC 2016


i agree with your responses.

Comment 20: should it be "3 See" instead of "3 See"?

Best Regards

Von: SLS-SLP [sls-slp-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org]" im Auftrag von "Kazz, Greg J (312B) [greg.j.kazz at jpl.nasa.gov]
Gesendet: Montag, 25. Juli 2016 20:30
An: sls-slp at mailman.ccsds.org
Cc: Thomas Gannett; Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int; Moury Gilles
Betreff: [Sls-slp] Comments CESG Review of USLP RED Book

Dear SLP WG,

Please review the attached Word document containing my comments on Peter Shames’ CESG review of the proposed first Red 1 Version of USLP.
I would appreciate it if you would provide me your comments on my responses in the attached Word document by the end of this week, July 29. Thereafter, I will send these comments on to the secretariat as final. Thank you !

Best regards,

Greg Kazz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-slp/attachments/20160728/a91ef9e0/attachment.html>

More information about the SLS-SLP mailing list