[Sls-slp] SLP WG review of CCSDS 211.1-P-3.1, Proximity-1 Space Link Protocol--Physical Layer

[Kazz, Greg J (313B)]

Enrico,

Here are the SLP WG inputs to you regarding the RID resolutions that overlap SLP and RFM for the Physical layer blue book:

Our review has yielded the following remarks:

Item 1: Prefer the second option. Rationale – prefer to keep titles of sections, diagrams, tables, etc as short as possible and not be verbose. Therefore clarifying upfront in the definitions section that the word "forward" is an abreviation in these documents for "forward link" and visa versa for "return" should provide ample guidance to the user.

Item 2: Agree with Enrico's RID resolution here.

Item 3: Agree with the RID resolution, but change the phrase "being provided" to "provided". Rationale: It is verbose.

Item 4: Agree with the RID resolution.

Item 5: Agree with the RID resolution, but also change the word, "communications" to "communication" as in the previous RID. Let's be consistent.

Item 6: Agree with Enrico's RID resolution and text here.

Items 7,8,9, 10: Not part of SLP purview – no comment.

Best regards,

Greg Kazz
Chairman SLS-SLP WG
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-slp/attachments/20120914/045d1f31/attachment.html>