[Sls-rfm] 401x0rp301 Agency Review conclusion

[Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int]

Wow !!

I am not used to that speed with ESA/ECSS publications !!

Thanks a lot, Enrico



From:   "Thomas Gannett" <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
To:     <Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int>, <sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org>, 
<James.S.Border at jpl.nasa.gov>, "'Volk, Christopher P\(US 335D\)'" 
<christopher.p.volk at jpl.nasa.gov>, <Javier.DeVicente at esa.int>, 
<Marco.Lanucara at esa.int>
Cc:     <gilles.moury at cnes.fr>
Date:   26/10/20 18:05
Subject:        RE: 401x0rp301 Agency Review conclusion



>Where are you with the corrigendum on Table 2.6.14-1 "Recommended TTFRs 
for the 22.55-23.15 MHz and 25.5-27.0 GHz Bands"? Is it being done 
independently or shall it be done together with insertion of the revised 
REC 2.5.6B and 3.1.6B?
 
Enrico: The editorial correction to the title of Table 2.6.14-1 was made 
the day we exchanged email messages about it. —Tom
 
 
Logothete, L.L.C.
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net
+1 443 472 0805
 
From: Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int [mailto:Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int] 
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 11:21 AM
To: sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org; James.S.Border at jpl.nasa.gov; Volk, 
Christopher P (US 335D); Javier.DeVicente at esa.int; Marco.Lanucara at esa.int
Cc: Thomas Gannett; gilles.moury at cnes.fr
Subject: 401x0rp301 Agency Review conclusion
 
Dear All, 

as agreed by the WG, here are the conclusions of this agency review: 
REC 2.5.6B and REC 3.1.6B received no RIDs and will be published in the 
401 BB as they are. 
REC 2.5.7B received 4 RIDs, all of editorial nature. RIDs disposition as 
well as updated REC as per RIDs disposition is attached. It will remain in 
the RFM WG until the two prototypes have been documented in the needed 
yellow book (planned for next meeting.)
Regards, Enrico
P.S. Tom: please use your version for REC 2.5.6B amd 3.1.6B when modifying 
the 401-BB as directed by the SLS AD resolution. Where are you with the 
corrigendum on Table 2.6.14-1 "Recommended TTFRs for the 22.55-23.15 MHz 
and 25.5-27.0 GHz Bands"? Is it being done independently or shall it be 
done together with insertion of the revised REC 2.5.6B and 3.1.6B?
This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may 
contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or 
dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies 
appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA 
Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).



This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20201026/77792d39/attachment-0001.htm>