[Sls-rfm] Proposed response to SOIS-WIR on CCSDS 883.0-BBv1

[Issler Jean-Luc]

Dear Enrico,

Thank you very much; I fully agree.

Very best regards

Jean-Luc

De : Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int <Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int>
Envoyé : lundi 19 octobre 2020 08:56
À : Issler Jean-Luc <Jean-Luc.Issler at cnes.fr>
Cc : catherine.c.sham at nasa.gov; sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org
Objet : RE: [Sls-rfm] Proposed response to SOIS-WIR on CCSDS 883.0-BBv1

Dear Jean-Luc,

thanks for the inputs. Here are my views.

1) Comments IJ1 and IJ2 in section 1

Section 1 is a copy of relevant text from the draft BB to avoid forcing the RFM WG to read the whole BB. As such we cannot comment there. However, they are de facto included in IJ3.

2) Comment IJ3 in section 2

Fine with me. I would turn the comment into a sentence.

3)  New text in section 2

I may move the first sentence up but I am fine with the contents.

4) New text in section 3

The text is fine but should not be in this section. We cannot state in a CCSDS BB that agencies should do an RFI analysis in SFCG but that agencies should consult with SFCG. I propose to move this useful background text to section 2, probably at the very end after your new text suggested in 3 above.

Let me know if this is acceptable to you.

Regards, Enrico





From:        "Issler Jean-Luc" <Jean-Luc.Issler at cnes.fr<mailto:Jean-Luc.Issler at cnes.fr>>
To:        "Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int<mailto:Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int>" <Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int<mailto:Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int>>, "sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org>" <sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Cc:        "catherine.c.sham at nasa.gov<mailto:catherine.c.sham at nasa.gov>" <catherine.c.sham at nasa.gov<mailto:catherine.c.sham at nasa.gov>>
Date:        16/10/20 18:20
Subject:        RE: [Sls-rfm] Proposed response to SOIS-WIR on CCSDS 883.0-BBv1
________________________________


Dear all,



Please find here a draft version including our questions and suggestions for updates.



Very best regards



Jean-Luc



De : SLS-RFM <sls-rfm-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sls-rfm-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>> De la part de Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int<mailto:Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int>
Envoyé : vendredi 16 octobre 2020 16:30
À : sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org>
Cc : catherine.c.sham at nasa.gov<mailto:catherine.c.sham at nasa.gov>
Objet : [Sls-rfm] Proposed response to SOIS-WIR on CCSDS 883.0-BBv1



Dear All,

please find attached the proposed RFM WG response to SOIS-WIR drafted by me and Dennis with the help of Ms. Sham, the SFCG chairperson for lunar and martian spectrum coordination.

Should I not receive any comments by Oct 26, I would assume concurrence of the WG and send it out to SOIS-WIR.

My idea is to send the whole document as it stands, thus providing some background info and not only the request for changes.

Best Regards, Enrico

This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or

protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received

this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect

personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int<mailto:dpo at esa.int>).[attachment "Response to SOIS-WIR on CCSDS 883.0-BBv1_draft1-----.docx" deleted by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA]

This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or

protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received

this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect

personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int<mailto:dpo at esa.int>).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20201019/117dd970/attachment-0001.htm>