[Sls-rfm] Fw: CCSDS RFM WG Spring meeting - first two inputs from DDOR WG

Thu Apr 16 13:20:00 UTC 2020

Dear All,

please find attached documents SLS-RFM_20-04 and -05 from the DDOR WG.

Please remember that the deadline for submitting the third and last 
document for discussion (SLS-RFM_20-03) is tomorrow.

Please also remember that the deadline for providing comments on these 3 
documents in writing is May 5.

I look forward to this review,

Enrico

----- Forwarded by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA on 16/04/20 15:15 -----

From:   Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA
To:     sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org, Andrea Modenini/estec/ESA at ESA, Giovanni 
Boscagli/estec/ESA at ESA, Javier De Vicente/esoc/ESA at ESA, "Border, James S 
(US 335D)" <james.s.border at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Volk, Christopher P (US 335D)" 
<christopher.p.volk at jpl.nasa.gov>, Massimo Bertinelli/estec/ESA at ESA
Cc:     Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA at ESA, gilles.moury at cnes.fr
Date:   08/04/20 09:41
Subject:        CCSDS RFM WG Spring meeting - proposed way forward - 
agreement

Dear All,

this is to inform you that I have not received any negative comments to my 
proposal that is therefore agreed by RFM and DDOR WGs. Thank you all for 
your agreement.

As you can see in the attachment, there is an additional input paper 
(SLS-RFM_20-06) that the author agreed to present at the Fall meeting.

Please make sure that the 3 DDOR papers (SLS-RFM_20-03, -04 and -05) are 
delivered to me and Jim by April 17. I will distribute them to the RFM WGs 
and ask for comments in writing by May 5.
Jim and myself will consult and suggest recommended way(s) forward after 
evaluating the comments impact.

Massimo will take care of the VCM paper for the joint C&S/RFM WG meeting; 
I understand that email discussion is proposed for it and that the April 
17 deadline for its submission is valid.

Best Regards, Enrico

[attachment "SLS-RFM (Spring 2020 Input Papers List) i0.3.docx" deleted by 
Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA] 

----- Forwarded by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA on 08/04/20 09:23 -----

From:   Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA
To:     sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org, Andrea Modenini/estec/ESA at ESA, Giovanni 
Boscagli/estec/ESA at ESA, Javier De Vicente/esoc/ESA at ESA, "Border, James S 
(US 335D)" <james.s.border at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Volk, Christopher P (US 335D)" 
<christopher.p.volk at jpl.nasa.gov>, Massimo Bertinelli/estec/ESA at ESA
Cc:     Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA at ESA
Date:   06/04/20 12:25
Subject:        CCSDS RFM WG Spring meeting - proposed way forward

Dear All,

by the RFM WG deadline 1)

        1) Friday 3 April               deadline to indicate the intended 
inputs (titles) 
        2) Friday 17 April      deadline to provide the actual inputs 

I received five input titles for the RFM WG meeting and two for the joint 
RFM/C&S WG meeting. ESA's colleagues who proposed 3 of these 7 titles do 
not see any urgency with them. I therefore propose that delivery of 
documents SLS-RFM_20-01 and 02 as well of the C&S "AI_19-13 – Proposal for 
simulation channel model" document be delayed to the Fall meeting, where 
discussion will take place.

For what concerns the joint RFM/DDOR WG meeting, I understand from DDOR 
chairman (Jim) that the group would prefer to progress the wide-band DDOR 
recommendation that has been discussed for quite some time.
As such, I would proposed that documents SLS-RFM_20-03, 04 and 05 be 
delivered as per deadline 2). 
Given that the face-to-face meetings have been cancelled, I would call for 
comments to these 3 documents be sent in writing to both RFM and DDOR WGs 
by May 5.
I would then analyse the received comments together with Jim and with the 
authors of the comments, and try to suggest possible solutions by email 
correspondence. Deadline for this milestone will depend on the number and 
severity of the received comments. In case of a few open issues remaining 
to be solved, a short and focused Webex may be called to address these 
items.

For what concerns the second C&S document proposed for the joint RFM/C&S 
meeting and dealing with VCM (action item response), it would seem from 
C&S chairman (Massimo) that it should be possible to come to a conclusion 
of the VCM project by email correspondence. In any case, I am leaving this 
decision to C&S WG since the action item is from C&S and apparently should 
not have any influence on the VCM areas of interest to RFM.

Please let me know if you are fine with my proposed way forward and if the 
proposed May 5 deadline appears feasible for reviewing the 3 inputs on the 
WB-DDOR recommendation. 

I trust that you are all safe and healthy,

Enrico

[attachment "SLS-RFM (Spring 2020 Input Papers List) i0.2.docx" deleted by 
Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA] 

This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20200416/a70b6e66/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SLS-RFM_20-04 (PN-DDOR recommendation).docx
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 556235 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20200416/a70b6e66/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SLS-RFM_20-05 (PN-DDOR implementation).docx
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3667078 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20200416/a70b6e66/attachment-0003.obj>