[Sls-rfm] CCSDS Review of CCSDS 401.0-P-25.1, Radio Frequency and Modulation Systems-Part 1: Earth Stations and Spacecraft

[Thomas Gannett]

OK, but I think the probability is high that the CESG will reject the update
without a test report.

 

 

Thomas Gannett

thomas.gannett at tgannett.net

+1 443 472 0805

 

From: Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int [mailto:Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 10:51 AM
To: Thomas Gannett
Cc: Marco.Lanucara at esa.int; Salvador.Marti at esa.int;
sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: RE: CCSDS Review of CCSDS 401.0-P-25.1, Radio Frequency and
Modulation Systems-Part 1: Earth Stations and Spacecraft 

 

Tom, 

no, we had many independent simulations and some hardware tests presented in
several input papers over the last 2-3 years. 

Regards, Enrico 



From:        "Thomas Gannett" <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net> 
To:        <Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int> 
Cc:        <sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org>, <Marco.Lanucara at esa.int>,
<Salvador.Marti at esa.int> 
Date:        29/06/2016 16:37 
Subject:        RE: CCSDS Review of CCSDS 401.0-P-25.1, Radio Frequency and
Modulation Systems-Part 1: Earth Stations and Spacecraft 

  _____  




Thanks, Enrico. Is there a test report? Tom 
  
Thomas Gannett 
thomas.gannett at tgannett.net 
+1 443 472 0805 
  
From: Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int [ <mailto:Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int>
mailto:Enrico.Vassallo at esa.int] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 9:49 AM
To: Thomas Gannett
Cc: sls-rfm at mailman.ccsds.org; Marco.Lanucara at esa.int;
Salvador.Marti at esa.int
Subject: CCSDS Review of CCSDS 401.0-P-25.1, Radio Frequency and Modulation
Systems-Part 1: Earth Stations and Spacecraft 
  
Dear Tom, 

please find attached RID dispositions and updated recommendation 2.4.23
ready for publication request. I trust that the SLS AD will take care of the
needed resolution as soon as he is back in office. 

Note that I called the recommendation "pre-blue" since I discovered that I
only had the Word version that the RFM WG submitted to you in November and
not the one you published as pink sheet in PDF format. However, it seems to
me that the latter has only a different page layout. 

Moreover, the changes are few and clearly highlighted and I am sure you can
copy them over the master document. 

Best Regards, Enrico 
This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee
or addressees only. 
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole
or in part) of its 
content is not permitted. 
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete
it from your system. 
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the
sender. 
  
Please consider the environment before printing this email. 

This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee
or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole
or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete
it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the
sender.
 
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-rfm/attachments/20160629/58eb478c/attachment.html>