[Sls-mhdc] Reconfirmation Review for 230.2-G-1 Next Generation Uplink Next Generation: Proposed Historical designation

[Kiely, Aaron B (332B)]

Dear Working Group,

It has been proposed that Green Book CCSDS-230.2.-G-1 Next Generation Uplink become a Silver book (see below).

If you have concerns about this proposal, please contact Gian Paolo.

Best Regards,
Aaron



Begin forwarded message:

From: <Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>>



        can you please forward ASAP the request below to your WG Members?

It is understood that the matters in that green book are not of big relevance for your WGs, however - since the original WG dissolved -  it would be good being sure we have no opposition in the Area  to silverization.

Thanks

Gian Paolo


----- Forwarded by Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA on 14-03-19 10:13 -----

From:        Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int<mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int>
To:        "SLS - Space Link Services Area" <sls at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sls at mailman.ccsds.org>>
Date:        13-03-19 09:21
Subject:        [SLS] Reconfirmation Review for 230.2-G-1 Next Generation Uplink Next Generation: Proposed Historical designation
Sent by:        "SLS" <sls-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sls-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>>
________________________________



Dear All,
       among the documents to be reviewed in 2019 there is:
------------------------------------
230.2-G-1 Next Generation Uplink Next Generation
Released July 2014
Reconfirmation Review due July 2019
Available at   https://public.ccsds.org/Pubs/230x2g1.pdf
-----------------------

The book was produced by the "Uplink Working Group" (chaired Greg if I remember well).
This group does not exist anymore and it does not look worth an effort for resurrect it.

After some preliminary discussion, an indication for silverization is evident.

Considering the fact that the NGU WG does not exist more, I want to poll all the existing WG in SLS Area to verify if there is any disagreement with the proposal to give the CCSDS Historical designation (Silver Book) to this document.
As you know, this designation  is reserved for any approved CCSDS document that has been superseded by a more recent version or is for any other reason considered to be obsolete.

Could you please forward this mail to your WG as appropriate to check if there is consensus for silverizing this book?
The deadline for comments requesting reconfirmation and/or modification is Thursday 21 March COB.
In case consensus across the SLS Area is confirmed, a relevant Area Resolution will be issued.


Thank you for your collaboration and best regards

Gian Paolo

This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int<mailto:dpo at esa.int>).

_______________________________________________
SLS mailing list
SLS at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:SLS at mailman.ccsds.org>
https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sls


This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int<mailto:dpo at esa.int>).


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-mhdc/attachments/20190315/31758d53/attachment.html>