[SLS-CC] Alignment to 401.0-B for DVB-S2X and SCCC-X orange books and for pink sheets to SCCC and DVB-S2

Mon May 31 09:33:07 UTC 2021

Gian Paolo,

no, my proposed amendment reads differently (see section 1,1 of the SCCC 
BB):
However, this Recommended Standard may be also adopted for other high data 
rate applications (either space-to-ground, ground-to-space, and 
space-to-space) and services (e.g., the Space Research service), as long 
as compliance to CCSDS recommendations for Radio Frequency modulations in 
[4] is ensured.

Sorry for not being clear,

Enrico

From:   Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA
To:     Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA at ESA
Cc:     Andrea Modenini/estec/ESA at ESA, "Lee, Dennis K (332G)" 
<Dennis.K.Lee at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Moury Gilles" <Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr>, "Ken 
Andrews" <Kenneth.S.Andrews at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Space Link Coding & 
Synchronization Working Group" <sls-cc at mailman.ccsds.org>, "Thomas 
Gannett" <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
Date:   31/05/21 11:26
Subject:        Alignment to 401.0-B for DVB-S2X and SCCC-X orange books 
and  for pink sheets to SCCC and DVB-S2

Thank you, Enrico.

Gilles and I are still performing the last check before issuing the 
relevant Area Resolution.
CESG and CMC poll will then start later also depenging on Tom's queue.

The DVB-S2X sentence you refer to is in section 1.2 PURPOSE (see snapshot)

and you propose to amend it according to a sentence we have in the SCCC 
(proposed) pink sheets section 2.1 ARCHITECTURE (see second snapshot)

Before a final conclusion is reached I want to remark that 
1) the pink sheets for DVB-S2 ( 
https://public.ccsds.org/Lists/CCSDS%201313P11/131x3p11.pdf ) misses a 
similar statement
2) the published of SCCCX (  https://public.ccsds.org/Pubs/131x21o1.pdf ) 
also misses any reference to 401.0-B and theferore also a similar 
statement

Having said this, I have the following questions (to everybody):
a) should a RID to DVB-S2 pink sheets request a statement similar to the 
one in SCCC (proposed) pink sheets to refer to 401.0-B?
b) should DVB-S2X add a statement similar to the one in SCCC (proposed) 
pink sheets to refer to 401.0-B?
c) should SCCC-X add [e.g. via Editorial Corrigendum] a statement similar 
to the one in SCCC (proposed) pink sheets to refer to 401.0-B?

Thank you all for any opinion (and sorry for increasing the entropy :o)

Gian Paolo

PS Since SCCC-X is now published at 
https://public.ccsds.org/Pubs/131x21o1.pdf , I also updated the strategic 
plan for this.
Andrea, Ken, can you please check the strategic plan at 
https://cwe.ccsds.org/fm/sp/Lists/SLSLinks/AllItems.aspx ?

From:   Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA
To:     Andrea Modenini/estec/ESA at ESA
Cc:     "Lee, Dennis K (332G)" <Dennis.K.Lee at jpl.nasa.gov>, Gian Paolo 
Calzolari/esoc/ESA at ESA, "Moury Gilles" <Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr>, "Ken 
Andrews" <Kenneth.S.Andrews at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Space Link Coding & 
Synchronization Working Group" <sls-cc at mailman.ccsds.org>, "Thomas 
Gannett" <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
Date:   31-05-21 10:44
Subject:        Re: [SLS-CC] Spring 2021 resolutions concerning CCSDS 
13.2-B, 131.0-B, and 131.6-O

Dear Andrea,

concerning the DVB-S2X OB, I noted that there is a sentence going like

and to recommend options of the DVB-S2(X) standard suited to high data 
rate transmission applications, such as Earth Exploration Satellite 
Services (EESS) payload telemetry, ground-to-space and space-to-space 
applications (Space Research Services SRS, inter-satellite links

I think it should be amended by the text you proposed for the SCCC liberal 
approach "....providing it is in line with 401" or similar.

I leave this up to you to get the agreement by CNES before resubmission 
otherwise I would have to send my comment via the ESA representative at 
CMC (or CESG, depending on the path for this book).

Sorry for being late but this book was not presented again as logical and 
I did not remember this sentence,

Enrico

From:   Andrea Modenini/estec/ESA
To:     "Space Link Coding & Synchronization Working Group" 
<sls-cc at mailman.ccsds.org>
Cc:     Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA at ESA, "Lee, Dennis K (332G)" 
<Dennis.K.Lee at jpl.nasa.gov>, "Ken Andrews" 
<Kenneth.S.Andrews at jpl.nasa.gov>, Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA at ESA, 
"Moury Gilles" <Gilles.Moury at cnes.fr>, "Thomas Gannett" 
<thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
Date:   29/05/21 14:04
Subject:        [SLS-CC] Spring 2021 resolutions concerning CCSDS 13.2-B, 
131.0-B, and 131.6-O

Dear all,
 by means of this email I formalise the C&S WG resolutions that we had 
during Spring meeting 2021.

Namely:
-Start agency review of CCSDS 131.2 in attachment (agreed with RFM WG 
during joint meeting)
-Start agency review of CCSDS 131.0 as provided in the email sent by Ken 
Andrews to the WG on 28-05-21 22:06 (CEST)
-To resubmit 131.6-O-1 (in attachment) as is for publication (in view of 
the Record of consensus and implementation of the liberal approach). 

I kindly ask SLS AD to raise the related Area resolutions.

Kind Regards

[attachment "SLS-CS_21-02 - Annex.doc" deleted by Enrico 
Vassallo/esoc/ESA] [attachment "CCSDS-DVBS2X-OB-v9.docx" deleted by Enrico 
Vassallo/esoc/ESA] 
HE Space Operations for ESA - European Space Agency
Ph.D. Andrea Modenini
Communication Systems & Technologies Engineer 
TT&C and PDT Systems & Techniques Section (TEC-EST)
RF Systems Division
ESTEC
Keplerlaan 1, PO Box 299
NL-2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands
andrea.modenini at esa.int | www.esa.int
T +31 71 56 53439

This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo at esa.int).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-cc/attachments/20210531/26e28283/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 23095 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-cc/attachments/20210531/26e28283/attachment-0002.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 17982 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sls-cc/attachments/20210531/26e28283/attachment-0003.gif>