[Sis-dtn] Fwd: [Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 14 September 2023

[Keith Scott]

I think he's looking for something like Bob did for BPv7, where there's an
agency POC for each assigned LTP engine ID (or at least a general agency
POC that can respond to questions about engine IDs allocated to the
agency).  Lifting / lightly editing the text for BPv7 should suffice --
I'll see if I can dig that up and propose something.

    --keith


On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 10:05 PM Tomaso de Cola via SIS-DTN <
sis-dtn at mailman.ccsds.org> wrote:

> CESG review of LTP corrigendum completed. One condition from Peter:
>
> Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions):  The registration process defined
> in Sec 3.6 of this document is completely inadequate for the purpose.  "LTP
> Engine IDs" are allocated by the SANA.  So far so good.  But the SANA LTP
> Engine Registry (https://sanaregistry.org/r/ltp_engineid/) only records a
> range of numbers assigned to some organization.  There is no: 1) PoC at
> that organization to make a request of, 2) guidance as to how those numbers
> are assigned nor what records must be kept, 3) registry of assigned IDs, 4)
> ""location of assigned IDs.  This really must be fixed if this is to be a
> useful operational registry.
>
> To be discussed in next telcos
>
> Tomaso
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From:* CCSDS Secretariat via CESG-All <cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org>
> *Date:* 15. September 2023 at 20:56:37 CEST
> *To:* cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org
> *Cc:* CCSDS Secretariat <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
> *Subject:* *[Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 14 September 2023*
> *Reply-To:* secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org
>
> Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions):  The registration process defined
> in Sec 3.6 of this document is completely inadequate for the purpose.  "LTP
> Engine IDs" are allocated by the SANA.  So far so good.  But the SANA LTP
> Engine Registry (https://sanaregistry.org/r/ltp_engineid/) only records a
> range of numbers assigned to some organization.  There is no: 1) PoC at
> that organization to make a request of, 2) guidance as to how those numbers
> are assigned nor what records must be kept, 3) registry of assigned IDs, 4)
> ""location of assigned IDs.  This really must be fixed if this is to be a
> useful operational registry.
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIS-DTN mailing list
> SIS-DTN at mailman.ccsds.org
> https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sis-dtn
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sis-dtn/attachments/20250728/20f36584/attachment.htm>