[Sis-dtn] [EXTERNAL] RE: BPv7 RIDs and Updates

[Tomaso.deCola at dlr.de]

Thank you, excellent!

Concerning the feedback from RIDs originator, we may want to add a column to track the status.

Regards,
Tomaso

From: Jackson, Jonathan W. (MSFC-HP27)[MOSSI2] <jonathan.w.jackson at nasa.gov>
Sent: Freitag, 28. Juni 2024 16:07
To: de Cola, Tomaso <Tomaso.deCola at dlr.de>
Cc: sis-dtn at mailman.ccsds.org
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: [Sis-dtn] BPv7 RIDs and Updates

Hi Tomaso,

The version I sent on 10 May has the track changes/comments minus RID 115 (see attached).
I was under the impression that the only RIDs that were not accepted by the originators were the new RIDs received when I became book manager.
I did receive concurrences on those, but I will take an action to verify all the RID responses are accepted by the originators.

Please let me know if you need anything further.


Thanks,
Jonathan


From: Tomaso.deCola at dlr.de<mailto:Tomaso.deCola at dlr.de> <Tomaso.deCola at dlr.de<mailto:Tomaso.deCola at dlr.de>>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2024 4:36 AM
To: Jackson, Jonathan W. (MSFC-HP27)[MOSSI2] <jonathan.w.jackson at nasa.gov<mailto:jonathan.w.jackson at nasa.gov>>
Cc: sis-dtn at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sis-dtn at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [Sis-dtn] BPv7 RIDs and Updates

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of NASA.  Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments.  Use the "Report Message" button to report suspicious messages to the NASA SOC.


Hi Jonathan,

Thank you for sharing the current version of the excel RID and new version of the book. Just two clarifications:


  1.  Is there also a word version in track/changes to better show the changes that were done with respect to the version pre-review agency 1.
  2.  Were the proposed changes stated in the RIDs accepted by the RIDs originators? I see most are coming from people usually present in our DTN WG telco, but others (like from CNES or Daniel Pettitt from ESA) are not participating to our telcos and we should make sure they are ok with how the RIDs have been implemented (or rejected).
Tomaso
From: SIS-DTN <sis-dtn-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sis-dtn-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org>> On Behalf Of Jackson, Jonathan W. (MSFC-HP27)[MOSSI2] via SIS-DTN
Sent: Donnerstag, 27. Juni 2024 18:44
To: sis-dtn at mailman.ccsds.org<mailto:sis-dtn at mailman.ccsds.org>
Subject: [Sis-dtn] BPv7 RIDs and Updates
Importance: High

Hello All,

Attached is the updated BPv7 book and RID spreadsheet for Final Reviews.
We've drafted the following note for RID 115 based on our discussion during today's telecon:

RID#

Paragraph Number

RID Short Title

From

To

Supporting Analysis

115

4.3.4

Creation Timestamp Sequence Number Clarification

The creation timestamp shall comprise the bundle creation time and the creation timestamp sequence number.

The creation timestamp shall comprise the bundle creation time and the creation timestamp sequence number.

NOTE: Implementations may choose to use the source node id and the creation timestamp sequence number. However, a global counter or a separate counter for each fully qualified source node ID is possible.

Without this wording there is enough ambiguity to allow for implementors to either associate the sequence number of the creation timestamp to a global counter which is the intent or on a per service basis potentially leading to unintended behavior.



Please let me know if you have any comments or questions.


Thanks,
Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sis-dtn/attachments/20240628/2eedd3f9/attachment.htm>