[Sis-dtn] Fwd: [Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 14 September 2023

[Tomaso.deCola at dlr.de]

CESG review of LTP corrigendum completed. One condition from Peter:

Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions):  The registration process defined in Sec 3.6 of this document is completely inadequate for the purpose.  "LTP Engine IDs" are allocated by the SANA.  So far so good.  But the SANA LTP Engine Registry (https://sanaregistry.org/r/ltp_engineid/) only records a range of numbers assigned to some organization.  There is no: 1) PoC at that organization to make a request of, 2) guidance as to how those numbers are assigned nor what records must be kept, 3) registry of assigned IDs, 4) ""location of assigned IDs.  This really must be fixed if this is to be a useful operational registry.

To be discussed in next telcos

Tomaso

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: CCSDS Secretariat via CESG-All <cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org>
Date: 15. September 2023 at 20:56:37 CEST
To: cesg-all at mailman.ccsds.org
Cc: CCSDS Secretariat <thomas.gannett at tgannett.net>
Subject: [Cesg-all] Results of CESG Polls closing 14 September 2023
Reply-To: secretariat at mailman.ccsds.org

Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions):  The registration process defined in Sec 3.6 of this document is completely inadequate for the purpose.  "LTP Engine IDs" are allocated by the SANA.  So far so good.  But the SANA LTP Engine Registry (https://sanaregistry.org/r/ltp_engineid/) only records a range of numbers assigned to some organization.  There is no: 1) PoC at that organization to make a request of, 2) guidance as to how those numbers are assigned nor what records must be kept, 3) registry of assigned IDs, 4) ""location of assigned IDs.  This really must be fixed if this is to be a useful operational registry.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sis-dtn/attachments/20230915/ab883afa/attachment.htm>