[Sis-dtn] FW: [dtn] high level summary

[Scott, Keith L.]

I highlighted the bpbis going to last call in what’s below.  This will essentially complete the IETF update to BP so the time to ensure that the new protocol is compatible with what we envision for the future of CCSDS (I think it is, but encourage a vigorous review) is now.

—keith

[thanks to Marc for the notes!]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet at viagenie.ca<mailto:marc.blanchet at viagenie.ca>>
Date: Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: [dtn] high level summary
To: DTN WG <dtn at ietf.org<mailto:dtn at ietf.org>>
Cc: dtn-chairs at ietf.org<mailto:dtn-chairs at ietf.org>


hello,
 while we will be publishing meeting notes, I thought that it would be useful for people to get a high-level super short summary of next steps following today’s meeting. Specially given the difficulties with the audio we had. Obviously, nuances are not detailed here.

Hope this is useful.

Marc.

====
Summary of next steps following today’s meeting

bpbis: start a 4 weeks wg last call around April 18th
bpsec: possibly move CMS to a separate doc. Ed to start a thread on ML. Need to talk to CCSDS about needs.
pkdn: we need to work on a requirement document, including assumptions, separating typical pki requirements with the ones that are specific or influenced by a dtn environment. Most likely need to be discussed with pkix experts.
ama: publish new version of requirements. start a discussion with OPS
ip neighbour: need to step back and write a more generic neighbour/local services discovery architecture document.
static routing: need addressing before. need editors for addressing.

_______________________________________________
dtn mailing list
dtn at ietf.org<mailto:dtn at ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sis-dtn/attachments/20160404/3c3fed9c/attachment.html>