[Fwd: RE: [Fwd: [Sis-ams] AMS RID BNSC-70]]
Scott Burleigh
Scott.Burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov
Tue Dec 18 11:25:36 EST 2007
Thanks, Stuart.
Scott
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [Fwd: [Sis-ams] AMS RID BNSC-70]
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:53:36 -0000
From: Stuart Fowell <Stuart.Fowell at scisys.co.uk>
To: Scott Burleigh <Scott.Burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov>
References: <4756F3B5.7080803 at jpl.nasa.gov>
Yes, I'm ok with 'reference' - ACCEPTED.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Scott Burleigh [mailto:Scott.Burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov]
*Sent:* 05 December 2007 18:54
*To:* Stuart Fowell
*Subject:* Re: [Fwd: [Sis-ams] AMS RID BNSC-70]
Stuart Fowell wrote:
> Using the term "Memo" just doesn't seem to me to make it immediately
> clear that this is the contents of a message. Actually, why not just
> call it "User Message", "Message", "Payload" or something similar? I
> know its only word-smithing but getting the right word can remove
> possible confusion
How about "reference", since in every case it's a value that refers to
(identifies) some data item to which the MPDU applies?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sis-ams/attachments/20071218/1c33f399/attachment.html
More information about the Sis-ams
mailing list