[Fwd: RE: [Fwd: [Sis-ams] AMS RID BNSC-70]]

[Scott Burleigh]

Thanks, Stuart.

Scott

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	RE: [Fwd: [Sis-ams] AMS RID BNSC-70]
Date: 	Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:53:36 -0000
From: 	Stuart Fowell <Stuart.Fowell at scisys.co.uk>
To: 	Scott Burleigh <Scott.Burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov>
References: 	<4756F3B5.7080803 at jpl.nasa.gov>



Yes, I'm ok with 'reference' - ACCEPTED.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Scott Burleigh [mailto:Scott.Burleigh at jpl.nasa.gov]
*Sent:* 05 December 2007 18:54
*To:* Stuart Fowell
*Subject:* Re: [Fwd: [Sis-ams] AMS RID BNSC-70]

Stuart Fowell wrote:
> Using the term "Memo" just doesn't seem to me to make it immediately 
> clear that this is the contents of a message. Actually, why not just 
> call it "User Message", "Message", "Payload" or something similar? I 
> know its only word-smithing but getting the right word can remove 
> possible confusion
How about "reference", since in every case it's a value that refers to 
(identifies) some data item to which the MPDU applies?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/sis-ams/attachments/20071218/1c33f399/attachment.html